001     181233
005     20240229145643.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1148/radiol.212692
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:35972360
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0033-8419
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1527-1315
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:134215060
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2022-01879
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Tavakoli, Anoshirwan Andrej
|0 P:(DE-He78)c6d2d9aa8c2d4ecd0dd6f96d2f40b7c3
|b 0
|e First author
245 _ _ |a Contribution of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion MRI to PI-RADS for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
260 _ _ |a Oak Brook, Ill.
|c 2023
|b Soc.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1671718179_4920
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a #EA:E010#LA:E010# / 2023 Jan;306(1):186-199
520 _ _ |a Background Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.0 requires multiparametric MRI of the prostate, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging sequences; however, the contribution of DCE imaging remains unclear. Purpose To assess whether DCE imaging in addition to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalized T2 values improves PI-RADS version 2.0 for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, clinically reported PI-RADS lesions in consecutive men who underwent 3-T multiparametric MRI (T2-weighted, DWI, and DCE MRI) from May 2015 to September 2016 were analyzed quantitatively and compared with systematic and targeted MRI-transrectal US fusion biopsy. The normalized T2 signal (nT2), ADC measurement, mean early-phase DCE signal (mDCE), and heuristic DCE parameters were calculated. Logistic regression analysis indicated the most predictive DCE parameters for csPCa (Gleason grade group ≥2). Receiver operating characteristic parameter models were compared using the Obuchowski test. Recursive partitioning analysis determined ADC and mDCE value ranges for combined use with PI-RADS. Results Overall, 260 men (median age, 64 years [IQR, 58-69 years]) with 432 lesions (csPCa [n = 152] and no csPCa [n = 280]) were included. The mDCE parameter was predictive of csPCa when accounting for the ADC and nT2 parameter in the peripheral zone (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% CI: 1.30, 2.44; P = .001) but not the transition zone (OR, 1.17; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.69; P = .41). Recursive partitioning analysis selected an ADC cutoff of 0.897 × 10-3 mm2/sec (P = .04) as a classifier for peripheral zone lesions with a PI-RADS score assessed on the ADC map (hereafter, ADC PI-RADS) of 3. The mDCE parameter did not differentiate ADC PI-RADS 3 lesions (P = .11), but classified lesions with ADC PI-RADS scores greater than 3 with low ADC values (less than 0.903 × 10-3 mm2/sec, P < .001) into groups with csPCa rates of 70% and 97% (P = .008). A lesion size cutoff of 1.5 cm and qualitative DCE parameters were not defined as classifiers according to recursive partitioning (P > .05). Conclusion Quantitative or qualitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was not relevant for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 lesion risk stratification, while quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were helpful in upgrading PI-RADS 3 and PI-RADS 4 lesions. Quantitative ADC measurement may be more important for risk stratification than current methods in future versions of PI-RADS. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article See also the editorial by Goh in this issue.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|c POF4-315
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
700 1 _ |a Hielscher, Thomas
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Badura, Patrick
|0 P:(DE-He78)98f3f4d9279b90a4fc6aa36dce929576
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Görtz, Magdalena
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Kuder, Tristan Anselm
|0 P:(DE-He78)59dfdd0ee0a7f0db81535f0781a3a6d6
|b 4
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Gnirs, Regula
|0 P:(DE-He78)77bc493068847c689d894d2eda891c0c
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Schwab, Constantin
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Hohenfellner, Markus
|0 0000-0003-3798-2039
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
|0 P:(DE-He78)3d04c8fee58c9ab71f62ff80d06b6fec
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Bonekamp, David
|b 9
|e Last author
773 _ _ |a 10.1148/radiol.212692
|g p. 212692
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2010588-5
|n 1
|p 186-199
|t Radiology
|v 306
|y 2023
|x 0033-8419
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:181233
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-He78)c6d2d9aa8c2d4ecd0dd6f96d2f40b7c3
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-He78)98f3f4d9279b90a4fc6aa36dce929576
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-He78)59dfdd0ee0a7f0db81535f0781a3a6d6
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-He78)77bc493068847c689d894d2eda891c0c
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-He78)3d04c8fee58c9ab71f62ff80d06b6fec
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b RADIOLOGY : 2022
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a IF >= 15
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9915
|2 StatID
|b RADIOLOGY : 2022
|d 2023-08-19
920 2 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331
|k E010
|l E010 Radiologie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331
|k E010
|l E010 Radiologie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
|k C060
|l C060 Biostatistik
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
|k E020
|l E020 Med. Physik in der Radiologie
|x 2
920 0 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331
|k E010
|l E010 Radiologie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21