% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Heumann:182814,
author = {P. Heumann$^*$ and M. E. Aguado-Barrera and B. Avuzzi and
D. Azria and E. Briers and R. Bultijnck and A. Choudhury and
D. De Ruysscher and M.-P. Farcy-Jacquet and V. Fonteyne and
A. Gómez Caamaño and I. Helmbold$^*$ and K. Johnson and S.
L. Kerns and M. Lambrecht and Z. Lingard and T. Rancati and
B. Rosenstein and E. Sperk and R. Paul Symonds and C. Talbot
and R. Valdagni and A. Vega and L. Veldeman and T. Ward and
A. Webb and C. West and J. Chang-Claude$^*$ and P.
Seibold$^*$},
collaboration = {R. Consortium},
title = {{C}omparing symptom reporting by prostate cancer patients
and healthcare professionals in the international
multicentre {REQUITE} study.},
journal = {Radiotherapy and oncology},
volume = {178},
issn = {0167-8140},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DKFZ-2022-02946},
pages = {109426},
year = {2023},
note = {#EA:C020#LA:C020# / Volume 178, January 2023, 109426},
abstract = {Previous studies showed that healthcare professionals and
patients had only moderate to low agreement on their
assessment of treatment-related symptoms. We aimed to
determine the levels of agreement in a large cohort of
prostate cancer patients.Analyses were made of data from
1,756 prostate cancer patients treated with external beam
radiotherapy (RT) and/or brachytherapy in Europe and the USA
and recruited into the prospective multicentre observational
REQUITE study. Eleven pelvic symptoms at the end of RT were
compared after translating patient-reported outcomes (PROs)
into CTCAE-based healthcare professional ratings. Gwet's AC2
agreement coefficient and $95\%$ confidence intervals were
calculated for each symptom. To compare severity of grading
between patients and healthcare professionals, percent
agreement and deviations for each symptom were graphically
depicted. Stratified and sensitivity analyses were conducted
to identify potential influencing factors and to assess
heterogeneity and robustness of results.The agreement for
the 11 pelvic symptoms varied from very good (AC2>0.8:
haematuria, rectal bleeding, management of sphincter
control) to poor agreement (AC2≤0.2: urinary frequency
fair, proctitis and urinary urgency). Fatigue had a negative
impact on the agreement. Patients tended to grade symptoms
more severely than healthcare professionals. Information on
sexual dysfunction was missing more frequently in healthcare
professional assessment than PROs.Agreement was better for
observable than subjective symptoms, with patients usually
grading symptoms more severely than healthcare
professionals. Our findings emphasize that PROs should
complement symptom assessment by healthcare professionals
and be taken into consideration for clinical decision-making
to incorporate the patient perspective.},
keywords = {adverse events (Other) / agreement (Other) /
patient-reported outcomes (Other) / prostate cancer (Other)
/ radiotherapy (Other)},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:36442608},
doi = {10.1016/j.radonc.2022.11.015},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/182814},
}