000186393 001__ 186393
000186393 005__ 20240918080107.0
000186393 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1186/s12889-022-14752-y
000186393 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:36544123
000186393 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:140447558
000186393 037__ $$aDKFZ-2022-03160
000186393 041__ $$aEnglish
000186393 082__ $$a610
000186393 1001_ $$aReinhardt, Anne$$b0
000186393 245__ $$aDrivers of young adults' voluntary compliance with COVID-19 protective measures: results from a multi-method study.
000186393 260__ $$aLondon$$bBioMed Central$$c2022
000186393 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000186393 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000186393 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1726639244_5616
000186393 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000186393 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000186393 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000186393 520__ $$aWith the easing of governmental COVID-19 restrictions, promoting voluntary public compliance with protective measures becomes essential for the pandemic evolution. A highly relevant target group for such health promotion are adolescents and young adults since they showed a strong decline in compliance throughout the pandemic. Building on an extended version of the Theory of Planned Behavior, this article investigates drivers of young people's intentions to engage in voluntary COVID-19 measures in phases of re-opening.We conducted a sequential multi-method study among 14- to 29-year-olds in Germany: (1) a semi-standardized online survey (N = 88) to examine underlying beliefs and (2) a standardized online survey (N = 979) to identify influencing factors of compliance. The pre-study addressed the respondents' perceptions about wearing a mask, social distancing, and avoiding crowded locations (open-ended questions). Responses for all protective measures were aggregated to identify general behavioral, normative, and control beliefs about COVID-19 protective measures. In order to gain generalizable insights into the factors determining voluntary compliance intentions in younger adults, we conceptualized the model constructs in the subsequent standardized online survey as formative measures based on their underlying beliefs. PLS-SEM was used to examine the effects of attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, risk perceptions, and knowledge on young people's intentions to comply (main study). Furthermore, a multi-group analysis was conducted to investigate differences between compliers and non-compliers.The pre-study revealed that young people's instrumental attitudes not only cover reasons of protection but also aspects of self-presentation (e.g., being a role model). The main study showed that besides knowledge and perceived severity of illness, instrumental attitude is the strongest predictor of intention to comply. The influence is even stronger in the group of non-compliers.This article highlights the importance of theory-based campaign planning and provides practical guidance to health communicators on how to increase voluntary compliance with COVID-19 protective measures in adolescents and young adults. The findings demonstrate the great potential of combining the Theory of Planned Behavior with risk perception and knowledge to gain deeper insights into the feelings and thoughts of younger target groups during a health crisis.
000186393 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-316$$a316 - Infektionen, Entzündung und Krebs (POF4-316)$$cPOF4-316$$fPOF IV$$x0
000186393 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
000186393 650_7 $$2Other$$aAdolescents
000186393 650_7 $$2Other$$aCOVID-19
000186393 650_7 $$2Other$$aTheory of planned behavior
000186393 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)8eb7c034317c85ac16b491268dde93d7$$aWeber, Winja$$b1$$udkfz
000186393 7001_ $$aRossmann, Constanze$$b2
000186393 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2041338-5$$a10.1186/s12889-022-14752-y$$gVol. 22, no. 1, p. 2401$$n1$$p2401$$tBMC public health$$v22$$x1471-2458$$y2022
000186393 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:186393$$pVDB
000186393 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)8eb7c034317c85ac16b491268dde93d7$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b1$$kDKFZ
000186393 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-316$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vInfektionen, Entzündung und Krebs$$x0
000186393 9141_ $$y2022
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bBMC PUBLIC HEALTH : 2021$$d2022-11-16
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-16
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-16
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-03-22T12:21:32Z
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-03-22T12:21:32Z
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Open peer review$$d2021-03-22T12:21:32Z
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2022-11-16
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2022-11-16
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-16
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2022-11-16
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2022-11-16
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine$$d2022-11-16
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2022-11-16
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2022-11-16
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2022-11-16
000186393 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2022-11-16
000186393 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)M100-20160331$$kM100$$lM100 Krebsinformationsdienst$$x0
000186393 980__ $$ajournal
000186393 980__ $$aVDB
000186393 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)M100-20160331
000186393 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED