% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hemminki:186485,
author = {K. Hemminki$^*$ and A. Försti$^*$ and V. Liska and A.
Kanerva and O. Hemminki and A. Hemminki},
title = {{L}ong-term survival trends in solid cancers in the
{N}ordic countries marking timing of improvements.},
journal = {International journal of cancer},
volume = {152},
number = {9},
issn = {0020-7136},
address = {Bognor Regis},
publisher = {Wiley-Liss},
reportid = {DKFZ-2022-03206},
pages = {1837-1846},
year = {2023},
note = {#EA:C020# / 2023 May 1;152(9):1837-1846},
abstract = {Survival studies are an important indicator of the success
of cancer control. We analyzed the 5-year relative survival
in 23 solid cancers in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden
over a 50-year period (1970-2019) at the NORDCAN database
accessed from the International Agency for Research on
Cancer website. We plotted survival curves in 5-year periods
and showed 5-year periodic survival. The survival results
were summarized in 4 groups: 1) cancers with historically
good survival $(>50\%$ in 1970-74) which include melanoma
and breast, endometrial and thyroid cancers; 2) cancers
which constantly improved survival at least 20 $\%$ units
over the 50 year period, including cancers of the stomach,
colon, rectum, kidney, brain and ovary; 3) cancer with
increase in survival >20 $\%$ units with changes taking
place in a narrow time window, including oral,
oropharyngeal, testicular and prostate cancers; 4) the
remaining cancers with <20 $\%$ unit improvement in survival
including lung, esophageal, liver, pancreatic, bladder, soft
tissue, penile, cervical and vulvar cancers. For cancers in
groups 1 and 2, the constant development implied multiple
improvements in therapy, diagnosis and patient care. Cancers
in group 3 included testicular cancers with known
therapeutic improvements but for the others large incidence
changes probably implied that cancer stage (prostate) or
etiology (oropharynx) changed into a more tractable form.
Group 4 cancers included those with dismal survival 50 years
ago but a clear tendency upwards. In 17 cancers 5-year
survival reached between 50 and 100 $\%$ while in only 6
cancers it remained at below $50\%.$ This article is
protected by copyright. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {early diagnosis (Other) / periodic survival (Other) /
prognosis (Other) / relative survival (Other) / treatment
(Other)},
cin = {C020 / B062 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)B062-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:36571455},
doi = {10.1002/ijc.34416},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/186485},
}