% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hoegen:186557,
author = {P. Hoegen$^*$ and E. Katsigiannopulos and C. Buchele and S.
Regnery and F. Weykamp$^*$ and E. Sandrini and J. Ristau and
J. Liermann and E. Meixner and T. Forster and C. K. Renkamp
and F. Schlüter and C. Rippke and J. Debus$^*$ and S.
Klüter and J. Hörner-Rieber$^*$},
title = {{S}tereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive
radiotherapy of adrenal metastases combines high ablative
doses with optimized sparing of organs at risk},
journal = {Clinical and translational radiation oncology},
volume = {39},
issn = {2405-6308},
address = {Amsterdam},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-00009},
pages = {100567},
year = {2023},
note = {#EA:E050#LA:E050#},
abstract = {Purpose/Objective: To evaluate the potential of
stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive
radiotherapy (SMART) to fulfill dose recommendations for
stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of adrenal metastases
and spare organs at risk (OAR). Materials and methods: In
this subgroup analysis of a prospective registry trial, 22
patients with adrenal metastases were treated on a 0.35 T
MR-Linac in 5–12 fractions with fraction doses of 4–10
Gy. Baseline plans were re-calculated to the anatomy of the
day. These predicted plans were reoptimized to generate
adapted plans. Baseline, predicted and adapted plans were
compared with regard to PTV objectives, OAR constraints and
published dose recommendations. Results: The cohort
comprised patients with large GTV (median 36.0 cc) and PTV
(median 66.6 cc) and predominantly left-sided metastases.
179 of 181 fractions (98.9 $\%)$ were adapted because of PTV
and/or OAR violations. Predicted plans frequently violated
PTV coverage (99.4 $\%)$ and adjacent OAR constraints
(bowel: 32.9 $\%,$ stomach: 32.8 $\%,$ duodenum: 10.4 $\%,$
kidneys: 10.8 $\%).$ In the predicted plans, the volume
exposed to the maximum dose was exceeded up to 16-fold in
the duodenum and up to 96-fold in the spinal cord. Adapted
plans significantly reduced OAR violations by 96.4 $\%$ for
the bowel, 98.5 $\%$ for the stomach, 85.6 $\%$ for the
duodenum and 83.3 $\%$ for the kidneys. Plan adaptation
improved PTV coverage from 82.7 ± 8.1 $\%$ to 90.6 ± 4.9
$\%$ (p < 0.001). Furthermore, recently established target
volume thresholds could easily be fulfilled with SMART. No
toxicities > grade II occurred. Conclusion: SMART fulfills
established GTV and PTV dose recommendations while
simultaneously sparing organs at risk even in a challenging
cohort.},
cin = {E050 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100567},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/186557},
}