% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Zhdanovich:186570,
author = {Y. Zhdanovich and J. Ackermann and P. J. Wild and J.
Köllermann and K. Bankov and C. Döring and N. Flinner and
H. Reis and M. Wenzel and B. Höh and P. Mandel and T. J.
Vogl and P. Harter and K. Weber$^*$ and I. Koch and S.
Bernatz},
title = {{E}valuation of automatic discrimination between benign and
malignant prostate tissue in the era of high precision
digital pathology.},
journal = {BMC bioinformatics},
volume = {24},
number = {1},
issn = {1471-2105},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-00019},
pages = {1},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Prostate cancer is a major health concern in aging men.
Paralleling an aging society, prostate cancer prevalence
increases emphasizing the need for efficient diagnostic
algorithms.Retrospectively, 106 prostate tissue samples from
48 patients (mean age, [Formula: see text] years) were
included in the study. Patients suffered from prostate
cancer (n = 38) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 10) and
were treated with radical prostatectomy or Holmium laser
enucleation of the prostate, respectively. We constructed
tissue microarrays (TMAs) comprising representative
malignant (n = 38) and benign (n = 68) tissue cores. TMAs
were processed to histological slides, stained, digitized
and assessed for the applicability of machine learning
strategies and open-source tools in diagnosis of prostate
cancer. We applied the software QuPath to extract features
for shape, stain intensity, and texture of TMA cores for
three stainings, $H\&E,$ ERG, and PIN-4. Three machine
learning algorithms, neural network (NN), support vector
machines (SVM), and random forest (RF), were trained and
cross-validated with 100 Monte Carlo random splits into
$70\%$ training set and $30\%$ test set. We determined AUC
values for single color channels, with and without
optimization of hyperparameters by exhaustive grid search.
We applied recursive feature elimination to feature sets of
multiple color transforms.Mean AUC was above 0.80. PIN-4
stainings yielded higher AUC than $H\&E$ and ERG. For PIN-4
with the color transform saturation, NN, RF, and SVM
revealed AUC of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text],
and [Formula: see text], respectively. Optimization of
hyperparameters improved the AUC only slightly by 0.01. For
$H\&E,$ feature selection resulted in no increase of AUC but
to an increase of 0.02-0.06 for ERG and PIN-4.Automated
pipelines may be able to discriminate with high accuracy
between malignant and benign tissue. We found PIN-4 staining
best suited for classification. Further bioinformatic
analysis of larger data sets would be crucial to evaluate
the reliability of automated classification methods for
clinical practice and to evaluate potential discrimination
of aggressiveness of cancer to pave the way to automatic
precision medicine.},
keywords = {Machine learning (Other) / Prediction (Other) / Prostate
cancer (Other) / Quantitative features (Other) / Statistical
analysis (Other)},
cin = {FM01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)FM01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:36597019},
doi = {10.1186/s12859-022-05124-9},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/186570},
}