Home > Publications database > Analysis of safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3. > print |
001 | 186587 | ||
005 | 20240229154900.0 | ||
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1007/s11060-022-04217-y |2 doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:36598613 |2 pmid |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 0167-594x |2 ISSN |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 0167-594X |2 ISSN |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 1573-7373 |2 ISSN |
024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:140840935 |2 altmetric |
037 | _ | _ | |a DKFZ-2023-00023 |
041 | _ | _ | |a English |
082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
100 | 1 | _ | |a Eichkorn, Tanja |0 0000-0003-0150-1328 |b 0 |
245 | _ | _ | |a Analysis of safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3. |
260 | _ | _ | |a Dordrecht [u.a.] |c 2023 |b Springer Science + Business Media B.V |
336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1685538892_22950 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
500 | _ | _ | |a 2023 May;162(3):489-501 |
520 | _ | _ | |a Proton beam radiotherapy (PRT) has been demonstrated to improve neurocognitive sequelae particularly. Nevertheless, following PRT, increased rates of radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) are feared. How safe and effective is PRT for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3?We analyzed 194 patients diagnosed with IDH-mutated WHO grade 2 (n = 128) and WHO grade 3 (n = 66) glioma who were treated with PRT from 2010 to 2020. Serial clinical and imaging follow-up was performed for a median of 5.1 years.For WHO grade 2, 61% were astrocytoma and 39% oligodendroglioma while for WHO grade 3, 55% were astrocytoma and 45% oligodendroglioma. Median dose for IDH-mutated glioma was 54 Gy(RBE) [range 50.4-60 Gy(RBE)] for WHO grade 2 and 60 Gy(RBE) [range 54-60 Gy(RBE)] for WHO grade 3. Five year overall survival was 85% in patients with WHO grade 2 and 67% in patients with WHO grade 3 tumors. Overall RICE risk was 25%, being higher in patients with WHO grade 2 (29%) versus in patients with WHO grade 3 (17%, p = 0.13). RICE risk increased independent of tumor characteristics with older age (p = 0.017). Overall RICE was symptomatic in 31% of patients with corresponding CTCAE grades as follows: 80% grade 1, 7% grade 2, 13% grade 3, and 0% grade 3 + . Overall need for RICE-directed therapy was 35%.These data demonstrate the effectiveness of PRT for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3. The RICE risk differs with WHO grading and is higher in older patients with IDH-mutated Glioma WHO grade 2 and 3. |
536 | _ | _ | |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315 |c POF4-315 |f POF IV |x 0 |
588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Efficacy |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a IDH-mutation |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Low and intermediate grade glioma |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Proton radiotherapy |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Radiation-induced contrast enhancement (RICE) |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Safety |2 Other |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Lischalk, Jonathan W |b 1 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Hörner-Rieber, Juliane |0 P:(DE-He78)c59ff25b48c192ed3fd4ad3a4bc9b9c0 |b 2 |u dkfz |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Deng, Maximilian |b 3 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Meixner, Eva |b 4 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Krämer, Anna |b 5 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Hoegen, Philipp |b 6 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Sandrini, Elisabetta |b 7 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Regnery, Sebastian |b 8 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Held, Thomas |b 9 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Harrabi, Semi |b 10 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Jungk, Christine |b 11 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Herfarth, Klaus |b 12 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Debus, Jürgen |0 P:(DE-He78)8714da4e45acfa36ce87c291443a9218 |b 13 |u dkfz |
700 | 1 | _ | |a König, Laila |b 14 |
773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1007/s11060-022-04217-y |0 PERI:(DE-600)2007293-4 |n 3 |p 489-501 |t Journal of neuro-oncology |v 162 |y 2023 |x 0167-594x |
909 | C | O | |p VDB |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:186587 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-He78)c59ff25b48c192ed3fd4ad3a4bc9b9c0 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 13 |6 P:(DE-He78)8714da4e45acfa36ce87c291443a9218 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Gesundheit |l Krebsforschung |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie |x 0 |
914 | 1 | _ | |y 2023 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DEAL Springer |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002 |2 StatID |d 2022-11-08 |w ger |
915 | _ | _ | |a DEAL Springer |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002 |2 StatID |d 2022-11-08 |w ger |
915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2022-11-08 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2022-11-08 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |d 2023-08-20 |w ger |
915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b J NEURO-ONCOL : 2022 |d 2023-08-20 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2023-08-20 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2023-08-20 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2023-08-20 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2023-08-20 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine |d 2023-08-20 |
915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2023-08-20 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331 |k E050 |l E050 KKE Strahlentherapie |x 0 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331 |k HD01 |l DKTK HD zentral |x 1 |
980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331 |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331 |
980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
---|