% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Meixner:186689,
author = {E. Meixner and A. Wark and T. Forster and F. Weykamp and K.
Lang and L. König and K. Lindel and J. T. Oelmann-Avendano
and J. Krisam and A. Schneeweiss and M. Ellerbrock and T.
Mielke and J. Hörner-Rieber$^*$ and K. Herfarth$^*$ and J.
Debus$^*$ and N. Arians},
title = {{H}ealth-related quality of life and patient-reported
symptoms after postoperative proton beam radiotherapy of
cervical and endometrial cancer: 2-year results of the
prospective phase {II} {APROVE}-trial.},
journal = {Radiation oncology},
volume = {18},
number = {1},
issn = {1748-717X},
address = {London},
publisher = {BioMed Central},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-00058},
pages = {5},
year = {2023},
abstract = {The APROVE-trial investigated the tolerability of
postoperative proton beam therapy in women with cervical or
endometrial cancer. The present analysis evaluated the
secondary endpoints of health-related quality of life
(HRQOL) and patient-reported symptoms.25 patients were
included in this prospective phase-II-trial and treated with
postoperative radiotherapy using protons alone or in
combination with chemotherapy. To attain general and
gynecologic-specific HRQOL measures, the EORTC-QLQ-C30
questionnaires combined with -QLQ-CX24 for cervical and
-QLQ-EN24 for endometrial cancer were assessed at baseline,
at the end of RT and up to 2 years after radiotherapy. The
results were compared to an age-matched norm reference
population. Symptoms were assessed using Common Terminology
Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and institutional
patient-reported symptoms grading.Scores regarding global
health status were markedly impaired at baseline (mean: 58.0
± 20.1) compared to reference population data, but
significantly (p = 0.036) improved and evened out to
comparable norm values 2 years after proton therapy (mean:
69.9 ± 19.3). Treatment caused acute and long-term
worsening of pain (p = 0.048) and gastrointestinal symptoms
(p = 0.016) for women with endometrial cancer, but no
higher-grade CTCAE ≥ 3° toxicity was observed. Dosimetric
evaluation of rectum, sigmoid, large and small bowel showed
no correlation with the reported gastrointestinal symptoms.
After 2 years, fatigue had significantly improved (p =
0.030), whereas patients with cervical cancer experienced
more often lymphedema (p = 0.017). Scores for endometrial
cancer pertaining to sexual activity (p = 0.048) and body
image (p = 0.022) had improved post treatment; in the latter
this effect persisted after 2 years.Proton beam therapy in
the adjuvant setting was well tolerated with only low-grade
side effects concerning gastrointestinal symptoms,
lymphedema and pain. Overall quality of life was impaired at
baseline, but patients were able to recover to values
comparable to norm population 2 years after proton therapy.
Larger studies are needed to confirm whether the benefit of
proton therapy translates into a clinical effect. Sexual
dysfunction remains an important issue.The trial was
registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov
Identifier: NCT03184350, 09th June 2017).},
keywords = {Gynecological cancer (Other) / Quality of life (Other) /
Radiochemotherapy (Other) / Radiotherapy (Other) / Toxicity
(Other) / Uterine neoplasm (Other)},
cin = {E050},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:36624483},
doi = {10.1186/s13014-023-02198-4},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/186689},
}