001     186757
005     20240229154904.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.004
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:36642110
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0360-3016
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-355X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:141592233
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2023-00101
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Arians, Nathalie
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Treatment tolerability and toxicity of postoperative proton beam therapy for gynecological malignancies - results of the prospective phase II APROVE-trial.
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2023
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1687785423_10948
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a #LA:E050# / 2023 Jul 15;116(4):825-836
520 _ _ |a The APROVE study is a prospective one-arm phase-II-study investigating the safety and treatment tolerability of postoperative proton beam therapy in women with uterine cervical or endometrial cancer. In this analysis, we report the primary study endpoint of safety and treatment tolerability as well as toxicity rates and progression-free survival (PFS).25 patients were treated with postoperative proton beam therapy with a total dose of 45-50.4 Gy (RBE) in 5-6 × 1.8 Gy (RBE) weekly using active raster-scanning intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT). Sequential or simultaneous Platinum-based chemotherapy was administered if indicated. The primary endpoint was defined as the lack of any acute ≥ grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) or urogenital (GU) toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 or premature treatment abortion. Secondary endpoints were clinical symptoms and toxicity, quality of life and PFS.All patients completed IMPT according to the protocol, with a median treatment duration of 43 days (range: 33-51 days). No patient developed GI or GU toxicity ≥ grade 3, the treatment tolerability rate was 100%. Therefore, the null hypothesis H0: Tolerability Rate ≤ 80% could be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis H1: Tolerability rate >80% using an exact binomial test with a one-sided significance level of α = 10% (one-sided p-value p=0.0059). The median follow-up time after the end of IMPT was 25.1 months (range: 20.2 - 50.3 months). 18 of 25 (75%) patients completed the study follow-up of 24 months. 7 patients had progressive disease. Kaplan-Meier-estimated mean PFS was 39.9 months (95%-CI 33.37 months; 46.5 months).Postoperative IMPT is a safe treatment option for cervical and endometrial cancer patients with only low-grade acute and late toxicities. Larger randomized trials are necessary to further assess the potential of IMPT and improve patient selection.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|c POF4-315
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
700 1 _ |a Lindel, Katja
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Krisam, Johannes
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Oelmann-Avendano, Jan Tobias
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Meixner, Eva
|b 4
700 1 _ |a König, Laila
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Hoerner-Rieber, Juliane
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Wark, Antje
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Forster, Tobias
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Weykamp, Fabian
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Lang, Kristin
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Schneeweiss, Andreas
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Ellerbrock, Malte
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Mielke, Thomas
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Herfarth, Klaus
|0 P:(DE-He78)ea5c703d5f5cf5f1c26a34b38a5056dc
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Debus, Juergen
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 15
|e Last author
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.004
|g p. S0360301623000123
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1500486-7
|n 4
|p 825-836
|t International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
|v 116
|y 2023
|x 0360-3016
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:186757
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 14
|6 P:(DE-He78)ea5c703d5f5cf5f1c26a34b38a5056dc
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 15
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-24
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b INT J RADIAT ONCOL : 2022
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b INT J RADIAT ONCOL : 2022
|d 2023-08-24
920 2 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331
|k E050
|l E050 KKE Strahlentherapie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331
|k E050
|l E050 KKE Strahlentherapie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
|k HD01
|l DKTK HD zentral
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21