% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Nabha:274337,
author = {R. Nabha and M. De Saint-Hubert and J. Marichal and J.
Esser and O. Van Hoey and C. Bäumer$^*$ and N. Verbeek and
L. Struelens and E. Sterpin and K. Tabury and L. Marek and
C. Granja and B. Timmermann$^*$ and F. Vanhavere},
title = {{B}iophysical characterization of collimated and
uncollimated fields in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.},
journal = {Physics in medicine and biology},
volume = {68},
number = {6},
issn = {0031-9155},
address = {Bristol},
publisher = {IOP Publ.},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-00543},
pages = {064001},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Objective. The lateral dose fall-off in proton pencil beam
scanning (PBS) technique remains the preferred choice for
sparing adjacent organs at risk as opposed to the distal
edge due to the proton range uncertainties and potentially
high relative biological effectiveness. However, because of
the substantial spot size along with the scattering in the
air and in the patient, the lateral penumbra in PBS can be
degraded. Combining PBS with an aperture can result in a
sharper dose fall-off, particularly for shallow
targets.Approach. The aim of this work was to characterize
the radiation fields produced by collimated and uncollimated
100 and 140 MeV proton beams, using Monte Carlo simulations
and measurements with a MiniPIX-Timepix detector. The dose
and the linear energy transfer (LET) were then coupled with
publishedin silicobiophysical models to elucidate the
potential biological effects of collimated and uncollimated
fields.Main results. Combining an aperture with PBS reduced
the absorbed dose in the lateral fall-off and out-of-field
by $60\%.$ However, the results also showed that the
absolute frequency-averaged LET (LETF) values increased by a
maximum of 3.5 keVμm-1in collimated relative to
uncollimated fields, while the dose-averaged LET (LETD)
increased by a maximum of 7 keVμm-1. Despite the higher LET
values produced by collimated fields, the predicted DNA
damage yields remained lower, owing to the large dose
reduction.Significance. This work demonstrated the
dosimetric advantages of combining an aperture with PBS
coupled with lower DNA damage induction. A methodology for
calculating dose in water derived from measurements with a
silicon-based detector was also presented. This work is the
first to demonstrate experimentally the increase in LET
caused by combining PBS with aperture, and to assess the
potential DNA damage which is the initial step in the
cascade of events leading to the majority of
radiation-induced biological effects.},
keywords = {Humans / Proton Therapy: methods / Protons / Radiotherapy
Planning, Computer-Assisted: methods / Radiotherapy Dosage /
Monte Carlo Method / DNA damage (Other) / Timepix (Other) /
aperture (Other) / collimation (Other) / pencil beam
scanning (Other) / proton therapy (Other) / Protons (NLM
Chemicals)},
cin = {ED01},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:36821866},
doi = {10.1088/1361-6560/acbe8d},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/274337},
}