%0 Journal Article
%A Handke, Analena Elisa
%A Albers, Peter
%A Schimmöller, Lars
%A Bonekamp, David
%A Asbach, Patrick
%A Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
%A Hadaschik, Boris A
%A Radtke, Jan Philipp
%T Systematic or targeted fusion-guided biopsy.[Systematische oder gezielte Fusionsbiopsie der Prostata.]
%J Die Urologie
%V 62
%N 5
%@ 2731-7064
%C New York]
%I Springer Medizin
%M DKFZ-2023-00576
%P 464-472
%D 2023
%Z #LA:E010# / 2023 May;62(5):464-472
%X Early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with a high risk for detecting low-risk disease. In the primary biopsy indication, systematic biopsy leads to an increased detection of clinically insignificant PCa, and significant prostate cancers are not detected with sufficient sensitivity, especially without prior magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Similar data have recently become available for PCa screening.In light of the current literature, this article aims to discuss the data on systematic and combined targeted and systematic multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-guided fusion biopsy to improve PCa diagnosis in clinically suspected cancer even in screening using multivariable risk stratification.Literature review on mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy (TRUS: transrectal ultrasonography) for tumor detection in suspected prostate cancer and PCa screening was performed.Multiparametric MRI as a reflex test after prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determination (PSA cut-off 4 ng/ml) in combination with targeted biopsy alone reduces the detection of clinically nonsignificant tumors in early detection by half. On the other hand, in the form of a target saturation or in combination with a systematic biopsy, the sensitivity for the detection of cancers of International Society of Urogenital Pathology (ISUP) grade groups 2 or higher can be improved. Similar results are also shown in PCa screening with a PSA cut-off of 3 ng/ml.The evidence for performing a targeted fusion biopsy alone is currently insufficient. Therefore, the combination of mpMRI-guided targeted and systematic biopsy continues to be the recommended standard for prostate cancer diagnosis.
%K Multiparametric MRI (Other)
%K Overdiagnosis (Other)
%K Prostate cancer (Other)
%K Prostate-specific antigen (Other)
%K Risk stratification (Other)
%F PUB:(DE-HGF)16
%9 Journal Article
%$ pmid:36941382
%R 10.1007/s00120-023-02062-z
%U https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/274376