% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Regnery:274461,
author = {S. Regnery and E. Katsigiannopulos and P. Hoegen and F.
Weykamp and E. Sandrini and T. Held and M. Deng and T.
Eichkorn and C. Buchele and C. Rippke and C. K. Renkamp and
L. König and K. Lang and M. Thomas and H. Winter and S.
Adeberg and S. Klüter and J. Debus$^*$ and J.
Hörner-Rieber$^*$},
title = {{T}o fly or not to fly: {S}tereotactic {MR}-guided adaptive
radiotherapy effectively treats ultracentral lung tumors
with favorable long-term outcomes.},
journal = {Lung cancer},
volume = {179},
issn = {0169-5002},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-00606},
pages = {107175},
year = {2023},
note = {#LA:E050#},
abstract = {Stereotactic radiotherapy of ultracentral lung tumors (ULT)
is challenging as it may cause overdoses to sensitive
mediastinal organs with severe complications. We aimed to
describe long-term outcomes after stereotactic magnetic
resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (SMART)
as an innovative treatment of ULT.We analyzed 36 patients
that received SMART to 40 tumors between 02/2020 - 08/2021
inside prospective databases. ULT were defined by planning
target volume (PTV) overlap with the proximal bronchial tree
or esophagus. We calculated Kaplan Meier estimates for
overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS),
and competing risk estimates for the incidence of tumor
progression and treatment-related toxicities. ULT patients
(N = 16) were compared to non-ULT patients (N = 20).Baseline
characteristics were similar between ULT and non-ULT, but
ULT were larger (median PTV: ULT 54.7 cm3, non-ULT 19.2
cm3). Median follow-up was 23.6 months. ULT and non-ULT
showed a similar OS (2-years: ULT $67\%,$ non-ULT $60\%,$ p
= 0.7) and PFS (2-years: ULT $37\%,$ non-ULT $34\%,$ p =
0.73). Progressions occurred mainly at distant sites (2-year
incidence of distant progression: ULT $63\%,$ non-ULT
$61\%,$ p = 0.77), while local tumor control was favorable
(2-year incidence of local progression: ULT $7\%,$ non-ULT
$0\%,$ p = 0.22). Treatment of ULT led to significantly more
toxicities ≥ grade (G) 2 (ULT: 9 $(56\%),$ non-ULT: 1
$(5\%),$ p = 0.002). Most toxicities were moderate (G2). Two
ULT patients developed high-grade toxicities: 1) esophagitis
G3 and bronchial bleeding G4 after VEGF treatment, 2)
bronchial bleeding G3. Estimated incidence of high-grade
toxicities was $19\%$ $(3-48\%)$ in ULT, and no
treatment-related death occurred.Our small series supports
SMART as potentially effective treatment of ULT. SMART with
careful fractionation could reduce severe complications, but
treatment of ULT remains a high-risk procedure and needs
careful benefit-risk-assessment.},
keywords = {Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) (Other) / MR-guided
adaptive radiotherapy (Other) / Magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) (Other) / Pulmonary cancer (Other) / Stereotactic body
radiotherapy (SABR) (Other)},
cin = {E050},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:36965207},
doi = {10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.03.011},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/274461},
}