% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bauer:274477,
author = {C. Bauer$^*$ and H. Teske$^*$ and A. Walter$^*$ and P.
Hoegen$^*$ and S. Adeberg and J. Debus$^*$ and O. Jaekel$^*$
and K. Giske$^*$},
title = {{B}iofidelic image registration for head and neck region
utilizing an in-silico articulated skeleton as a
transformation model.},
journal = {Physics in medicine and biology},
volume = {68},
number = {9},
issn = {0031-9155},
address = {Bristol},
publisher = {IOP Publ.},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-00622},
pages = {095006},
year = {2023},
note = {#EA:E040#LA:E040# / 2023 Apr 19;68(9)},
abstract = {We propose an integration scheme for a biomechanical motion
model into a deformable image registration. We demonstrate
its accuracy and reproducibility for adaptive radiation
therapy in the head and neck $region.\
Approach:$ The
novel registration scheme for the bony structures in the
head and neck regions is based on a previously developed
articulated kinematic skeleton model. The realized iterative
single-bone optimization process directly triggers posture
changes of the articulated skeleton, exchanging the
transformation model within the deformable image
registration $process.\
Accuracy$ in terms of target
registration errors in the bones is evaluated for 18 vector
fields of three patients between each planning CT and six
fraction CT scans distributed along the treatment
$course.\
Main$ results: The median of target
registration error distribution of the landmark pairs is 1.4
± 0.3 mm. This is sufficient accuracy for adaptive
radiation therapy. The registration performs equally well
for all three patients and no degradation of the
registration accuracy can be observed throughout the
$treatment.\
Significance:$ Deformable image
registration, despite its known residual uncertainties, is
until now the tool of choice towards online re-planning
automation. By introducing a biofidelic motion model into
the optimization, we provide a viable way towards an
in-build quality $assurance.\
.$},
keywords = {articulated skeleton (Other) / biomechanical model (Other)
/ bone and joint kinematics (Other) / deformable image
registration (Other) / head and neck cancer (Other) /
interfractional motion (Other)},
cin = {E040 / E050 / HD01},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E040-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:36972617},
doi = {10.1088/1361-6560/acc7f1},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/274477},
}