% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Acker:275223,
author = {G. Acker and M. Nachbar and N. Soffried and B. Bodnar and
A. Janas and K. Krantchev and G. Kalinauskaite and A. Kluge
and D. Shultz and A. Conti and D. Kaul$^*$ and D. Zips and
P. Vajkoczy and C. Senger},
title = {{W}hat if: {A} retrospective reconstruction of resection
cavity stereotactic radiosurgery to mimic neoadjuvant
stereotactic radiosurgery.},
journal = {Frontiers in oncology},
volume = {13},
issn = {2234-943X},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-00681},
pages = {1056330},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (NaSRS) of brain
metastases has gained importance, but it is not routinely
performed. While awaiting the results of prospective
studies, we aimed to analyze the changes in the volume of
brain metastases irradiated pre- and postoperatively and the
resulting dosimetric effects on normal brain tissue (NBT).We
identified patients treated with SRS at our institution to
compare hypothetical preoperative gross tumor and planning
target volumes (pre-GTV and pre-PTV) with original
postoperative resection cavity volumes (post-GTV and
post-PTV) as well as with a standardized-hypothetical PTV
with 2.0 mm margin. We used Pearson correlation to assess
the association between the GTV and PTV changes with the
pre-GTV. A multiple linear regression analysis was
established to predict the GTV change. Hypothetical planning
for the selected cases was created to assess the volume
effect on the NBT exposure. We performed a literature review
on NaSRS and searched for ongoing prospective trials.We
included 30 patients in the analysis. The pre-/post-GTV and
pre-/post-PTV did not differ significantly. We observed a
negative correlation between pre-GTV and GTV-change, which
was also a predictor of volume change in the regression
analysis, in terms of a larger volume change for a smaller
pre-GTV. In total, $62.5\%$ of cases with an enlargement
greater than 5.0 cm3 were smaller tumors (pre-GTV < 15.0
cm3), whereas larger tumors greater than 25.0 cm3 showed
only a decrease in post-GTV. Hypothetical planning for the
selected cases to evaluate the volume effect resulted in a
median NBT exposure of only $67.6\%$ (range: $33.2-84.5\%)$
relative to the dose received by the NBT in the
postoperative SRS setting. Nine published studies and twenty
ongoing studies are listed as an overview.Patients with
smaller brain metastases may have a higher risk of volume
increase when irradiated postoperatively. Target volume
delineation is of great importance because the PTV directly
affects the exposure of NBT, but it is a challenge when
contouring resection cavities. Further studies should
identify patients at risk of relevant volume increase to be
preferably treated with NaSRS in routine practice. Ongoing
clinical trials will evaluate additional benefits of NaSRS.},
keywords = {CyberKnife® (Other) / brain metastases (BM) (Other) /
neoadjuvant (Other) / preoperative (Other) / stereotactic
radiosurgery (SRS) (Other)},
cin = {BE01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)BE01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37007157},
pmc = {pmc:PMC10062706},
doi = {10.3389/fonc.2023.1056330},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/275223},
}