% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Peters:275590,
author = {N. Peters and V. Trier Taasti and B. Ackermann and A. Bolsi
and C. Vallhagen Dahlgren and M. Ellerbrock and F.
Fracchiolla and C. Gomà and J. Góra and P. Cambraia Lopes
and I. Rinaldi and K. Salvo and I. Sojat Tarp and A. Vai and
T. Bortfeld and A. Lomax and C. Richter$^*$ and P.
Wohlfahrt},
title = {{C}onsensus guide on {CT}-based prediction of
stopping-power ratio using a {H}ounsfield look-up table for
proton therapy.},
journal = {Radiotherapy and oncology},
volume = {184},
issn = {0167-8140},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-00801},
pages = {109675},
year = {2023},
note = {2023 Jul;184:109675},
abstract = {Studies have shown large variations in stopping-power ratio
(SPR) prediction from computed tomography (CT) across
European proton centres. To standardise this process, a
step-by-step guide on specifying a Hounsfield look-up table
(HLUT) is presented here.The HLUT specification process is
divided into six steps: Phantom setup, CT acquisition, CT
number extraction, SPR determination, HLUT specification,
and HLUT validation. Appropriate CT phantoms have a head-
and body-sized part, with tissue-equivalent inserts in
regard to X-ray and proton interactions. CT numbers are
extracted from a region-of-interest covering the inner
$70\%$ of each insert in-plane and several axial CT slices
in scan direction. For optimal HLUT specification, the SPR
of phantom inserts is measured in a proton beam and the SPR
of tabulated human tissues is computed stoichiometrically at
100 MeV. Including both phantom inserts and tabulated human
tissues increases HLUT stability. Piecewise linear
regressions are performed between CT numbers and SPRs for
four tissue groups (lung, adipose, soft tissue, and bone)
and then connected with straight lines. Finally, a thorough
but simple validation is performed.The best practices and
individual challenges are explained comprehensively for each
step. A well-defined strategy for specifying the connection
points between the individual line segments of the HLUT is
presented. The guide was tested exemplarily on three CT
scanners from different vendors, proving its feasibility.The
presented step-by-step guide for CT-based HLUT specification
with recommendations and examples can contribute to reduce
inter-centre variations in SPR prediction.},
keywords = {Hounsfield look-up table (Other) / Particle therapy (Other)
/ Proton range prediction (Other) / Proton therapy (Other) /
Single-energy CT (Other) / Stoichiometric calibration
(Other) / Stopping-power ratio (Other)},
cin = {DD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)DD01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37084884},
doi = {10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109675},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/275590},
}