% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hiensch:275963,
author = {A. E. Hiensch and J. Beckhaus and L. Witlox and E. M.
Monninkhof and S. B. Schagen and J. K. van Vulpen and M. G.
Sweegers and R. U. Newton and N. K. Aaronson and D. A.
Galvão and K. Steindorf$^*$ and M. M. Stuiver and I.
Mesters and H. Knoop and M. M. Goedendorp and M. Bohus and
L. Thorsen and K.-H. Schulz and M. E. Schmidt$^*$ and C. M.
Ulrich and G. S. Sonke and W. H. van Harten and K. M.
Winters-Stone and M. J. Velthuis and D. R. Taaffe and W. van
Mechelen and M. J. Kersten and F. Nollet and J. Wiskemann
and L. M. Buffart and A. M. May},
title = {{M}oderators of exercise effects on self-reported cognitive
functioning in cancer survivors: an individual participant
data meta-analysis.},
journal = {Journal of cancer survivorship},
volume = {18},
number = {5},
issn = {1932-2259},
address = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-00945},
pages = {1492-1503},
year = {2024},
note = {2024 Oct;18(5):1492-1503},
abstract = {This individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA)
assesses exercise effects on self-reported cognitive
functioning (CF) and investigates whether effects differ by
patient-, intervention-, and exercise-related
characteristics.IPD from 16 exercise RCTs, including 1987
patients across multiple types of non-metastatic cancer, was
pooled. A one-stage IPD-MA using linear mixed-effect models
was performed to assess exercise effects on self-reported CF
(z-score) and to identify whether the effect was moderated
by sociodemographic, clinical, intervention- and
exercise-related characteristics, or fatigue, depression,
anxiety, and self-reported CF levels at start of the
intervention (i.e., baseline). Models were adjusted for
baseline CF and included a random intercept at study level
to account for clustering of patients within studies. A
sensitivity analysis was performed in patients who reported
cognitive problems at baseline.Minimal significant
beneficial exercise effects on self-reported CF (β=-0.09
[-0.16; -0.02]) were observed, with slightly larger effects
when the intervention was delivered post-treatment (n=745,
β=-0.13 [-0.24; -0.02]), and no significant effect during
cancer treatment (n=1,162, β=-0.08 [-0.18; 0.02]). Larger
effects were observed in interventions of 12 weeks or
shorter (β=-0.14 [-0.25; -0.04]) or 24 weeks or longer
(β=-0.18 [-0.32; -0.02]), whereas no effects were observed
in interventions of 12-24 weeks (β=0.01 [-0.13; 0.15]).
Exercise interventions were most beneficial when provided to
patients without anxiety symptoms (β=-0.10 [-0.19; -0.02])
or after completion of treatment in patients with cognitive
problems (β=-0.19 [-0.31; -0.06]). No other significant
moderators were identified.This cross-cancer IPD
meta-analysis observed small beneficial exercise effects on
self-reported CF when the intervention was delivered
post-treatment, especially in patients who reported
cognitive problems at baseline.This study provides some
evidence to support the prescription of exercise to improve
cognitive functioning. Sufficiently powered trials are
warranted to make more definitive recommendations and
include these in the exercise guidelines for cancer
survivors.},
keywords = {Cancer (Other) / Cognitive functioning (Other) / Exercise
(Other) / Individual participant data meta-analysis (Other)
/ Survivorship (Other)},
cin = {C110},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C110-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37160571},
doi = {DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01392-3},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/275963},
}