% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Guberina:276773,
author = {N. Guberina and F. Padeberg and C. Pöttgen and M. Guberina
and L. Lazaridis and R. Jabbarli and C. Deuschl and K.
Herrmann and T. Blau and K. H. Wrede and K. Keyvani and B.
Scheffler$^*$ and J. Hense and J. P. Layer and M. Glas and
U. Sure and M. Stuschke$^*$},
title = {{L}ocation of {R}ecurrences after {T}rimodality {T}reatment
for {G}lioblastoma with {R}espect to the {D}elivered
{R}adiation {D}ose {D}istribution and {I}ts {I}nfluence on
{P}rognosis.},
journal = {Cancers},
volume = {15},
number = {11},
issn = {2072-6694},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-01154},
pages = {2982},
year = {2023},
abstract = {While prognosis of glioblastoma after trimodality treatment
is well examined, recurrence pattern with respect to the
delivered dose distribution is less well described.
Therefore, here we examine the gain of additional margins
around the resection cavity and gross-residual-tumor.All
recurrent glioblastomas initially treated with
radiochemotherapy after neurosurgery were included. The
percentage overlap of the recurrence with the gross tumor
volume (GTV) expanded by varying margins (10 mm to 20 mm)
and with the $95\%$ and $90\%$ isodose was measured.
Competing-risks analysis was performed in dependence on
recurrence pattern.Expanding the margins from 10 mm to 15
mm, to 20 mm, to the $95\%-$ and $90\%$ isodose of the
delivered dose distribution with a median margin of 27 mm
did moderately increase the proportion of relative in-field
recurrence volume from $64\%$ to $68\%,$ $70\%,$ $88\%$ and
$88\%$ (p < 0.0001). Overall survival of patients with
in-and out-field recurrence was similar (p = 0.7053). The
only prognostic factor significantly associated with
out-field recurrence was multifocality of recurrence (p =
0.0037). Cumulative incidences of in-field recurrences at 24
months were $60\%,$ $22\%$ and $11\%$ for recurrences
located within a 10 mm margin, outside a 10 mm margin but
within the $95\%$ isodose, or outside the $95\%$ isodose (p
< 0.0001). Survival from recurrence was improved after
complete resection (p = 0.0069). Integrating these data into
a concurrent-risk model shows that extending margins beyond
10 mm has only small effects on survival hardly detectable
by clinical trials.Two-thirds of recurrences were observed
within a 10 mm margin around the GTV. Smaller margins reduce
normal brain radiation exposure allowing for more extensive
salvage radiation therapy options in case of recurrence.
Prospective trials using margins smaller than 20 mm around
the GTV are warranted.},
keywords = {glioblastoma (Other) / intensity modulated radiation
therapy (IMRT) (Other) / neurosurgery (Other) / recurrence
pattern (Other) / volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
(Other)},
cin = {ED01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37296942},
pmc = {pmc:PMC10252044},
doi = {10.3390/cancers15112982},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/276773},
}