% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Menzel:276893,
author = {M. Menzel and V. Endris and C. Schwab and K. Kluck and O.
Neumann and S. Beck and M. Ball and C. Schaaf and S.
Fröhling$^*$ and P. Lichtner and P. Schirmacher$^*$ and D.
Kazdal and A. Stenzinger$^*$ and J. Budczies$^*$},
title = {{A}ccurate tumor purity determination is critical for the
analysis of homologous recombination deficiency ({HRD}).},
journal = {Translational oncology},
volume = {35},
issn = {1944-7124},
address = {Ann Arbor, Mich.},
publisher = {[Verlag nicht ermittelbar]},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-01195},
pages = {101706},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a predictive
marker for response to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase
inhibitors (PARPi) in ovarian carcinoma. HRD scores have
entered routine diagnostics, but the influence of
algorithms, parameters and confounders has not been analyzed
comprehensively. A series of 100 poorly differentiated
ovarian carcinoma samples was analyzed using whole exome
sequencing (WES) and genotyping. Tumor purity was determined
using conventional pathology, digital pathology, and two
bioinformatic methods. HRD scores were calculated from copy
number profiles determined by Sequenza and by Sclust either
with or without fixed tumor purity. Tumor purity
determination by digital pathology combined with a tumory
purity informed variant of Sequenza served as reference
method for HRD scoring. Seven tumors had deleterious
mutations in BRCA1/2, 12 tumors had deleterious mutations in
other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, 18 tumors
had variants of unknown significance (VUS) in BRCA1/2 or
other HRR genes, while the remaining 63 tumors had no
relevant alterations. Using the reference method for HRD
scoring, 68 tumors were HRD-positive. HRDsum determined by
WES correlated strongly with HRDsum determined by single
nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays (R = 0.85).
Conventional pathology systematically overestimated tumor
purity by $8\%$ compared to digital pathology. All
investigated methods agreed on classifying the deleterious
BRCA1/2-mutated tumors as HRD-positive, but discrepancies
were observed for some of the remaining tumors. Discordant
HRD classification of $11\%$ of the tumors was observed
comparing the tumor purity uninformed default of Sequenza
and the reference method. In conclusion, tumor purity is a
critical factor for the determination of HRD scores.
Assistance by digital pathology helps to improve accuracy
and imprecision of its estimation.},
keywords = {HRD (Other) / Homologous recombination deficiency (Other) /
Tumor cell content (Other) / Tumor purity (Other) / WES
(Other) / Whole exome sequencing (Other)},
cin = {HD01 / B340},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)B340-20160331},
pnm = {312 - Funktionelle und strukturelle Genomforschung
(POF4-312)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-312},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37327584},
doi = {10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101706},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/276893},
}