% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{deCock:277313,
author = {M. P. de Cock and A. de Vries and M. Fonville and H. J.
Esser and C. Mehl and R. G. Ulrich and M. Joeres and D.
Hoffmann and T. Eisenberg and K. Schmidt$^*$ and M. Hulst
and W. H. M. van der Poel and H. Sprong and M. Maas},
title = {{I}ncreased rat-borne zoonotic disease hazard in greener
urban areas.},
journal = {The science of the total environment},
volume = {896},
issn = {0048-9697},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-01331},
pages = {165069},
year = {2023},
note = {Microbiological Diagnostics /Volume 896, 20 October 2023,
165069},
abstract = {Urban greening has benefits for both human and
environmental health. However, urban greening might also
have negative effects as the abundance of wild rats, which
can host and spread a great diversity of zoonotic pathogens,
increases with urban greenness. Studies on the effect of
urban greening on rat-borne zoonotic pathogens are currently
unavailable. Therefore, we investigated how urban greenness
is associated with rat-borne zoonotic pathogen prevalence
and diversity, and translated this to human disease hazard.
We screened 412 wild rats (Rattus norvegicus and Rattus
rattus) from three cities in the Netherlands for 18
different zoonotic pathogens: Bartonella spp., Leptospira
spp., Borrelia spp., Rickettsia spp., Anaplasma
phagocytophilum, Neoehrlichia mikurensis, Spiroplasma spp.,
Streptobacillus moniliformis, Coxiella burnetii, Salmonella
spp., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA),
extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)/AmpC-producing
Escherichia coli, rat hepatitis E virus (ratHEV), Seoul
orthohantavirus, Cowpox virus, severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Toxoplasma gondii and
Babesia spp. We modelled the relationships between pathogen
prevalence and diversity and urban greenness. We detected 13
different zoonotic pathogens. Rats from greener urban areas
had a significantly higher prevalence of Bartonella spp. and
Borrelia spp., and a significantly lower prevalence of
ESBL/AmpC-producing E. coli and ratHEV. Rat age was
positively correlated with pathogen diversity while
greenness was not related to pathogen diversity.
Additionally, Bartonella spp. occurrence was positively
correlated with that of Leptospira spp., Borrelia spp. and
Rickettsia spp., and Borrelia spp. occurrence was also
positively correlated with that of Rickettsia spp. Our
results show an increased rat-borne zoonotic disease hazard
in greener urban areas, which for most pathogens was driven
by the increase in rat abundance rather than pathogen
prevalence. This highlights the importance of keeping rat
densities low and investigating the effects of urban
greening on the exposure to zoonotic pathogens in order to
make informed decisions and to take appropriate
countermeasures preventing zoonotic diseases.},
keywords = {Co-infection (Other) / Disease ecology (Other) /
Ectoparasites (Other) / Epidemiology (Other) / Richness
(Other) / Rodents (Other)},
cin = {W440},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)W440-20160331},
pnm = {316 - Infektionen, Entzündung und Krebs (POF4-316)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-316},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37392874},
doi = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165069},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/277313},
}