% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Livingstone:277708,
author = {E. Livingstone$^*$ and H. Gogas and L. Kandolf-Sekulovic
and F. Meier and T. K. Eigentler and M. Ziemer and P. A. M.
Terheyden and A. H. Gesierich and R. A. Herbst and K. C.
Kähler and D. C. Ziogas and Z. Mijuskovic and M. Garzarolli
and C. Garbe and A. Roesch$^*$ and S. Ugurel$^*$ and R.
Gutzmer and J. J. Grob and F. Kiecker and J. Utikal$^*$ and
C. Windemuth-Kieselbach and S. Eckhardt and L. Zimmer$^*$
and D. Schadendorf$^*$},
title = {{E}arly switch from run-in treatment with vemurafenib plus
cobimetinib to atezolizumab after 3 months leads to rapid
loss of tumour control in patients with advanced
{BRAFV}600-positive melanoma: {T}he {I}mmuno{C}obi{V}em
phase 2 randomised trial.},
journal = {European journal of cancer},
volume = {190},
issn = {0014-2964},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-01425},
pages = {112941},
year = {2023},
abstract = {ImmunoCobiVem investigated whether a planned switch to
atezolizumab after achieving tumour control during run-in
with vemurafenib + cobimetinib improves progression-free
survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to
continuous targeted therapy (TT) in patients with previously
untreated advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma.In this
multicenter phase 2 study, patients received vemurafenib
plus cobimetinib. After 3months, patients without
progressive disease (PD) were randomly assigned (1:1) to
continue vemurafenib + cobimetinib (Arm A) or switch to
atezolizumab (Arm B) until first documented PD (PD1).
Primary outcome was PFS1 (time from start of run-in until
PD1 or death). OS and safety were also assessed.Of 185
patients enroled between November 2016 and December 2019,
135 were randomly assigned after the run-in period (Arm A, n
= 69; Arm B, n = 66). Median PFS1 was significantly longer
in Arm A versus Arm B (13.9 versus 5.9months; hazard ratio
[HR] 0.55; $95\%$ confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.84;
PStratified=0.001). Median OS was not reached in either arm
(HR 1.22; $95\%CI,$ 0.69-2.16; PStratified=0.389); 2-year OS
was higher in Arm B versus Arm A $(67\%;$ $95\%CI,$ 53-78
versus $58\%;$ $95\%CI,$ 45-70). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in
$55\%$ of patients in Arm A and $64\%$ in Arm B;
treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation of any drug in
$7\%$ and $9\%$ of patients, respectively.In patients with
BRAFV600-mutated advanced melanoma who achieve tumour
control with TT, early switch at 3months to atezolizumab led
to rapid loss of tumour control but provided a numerical OS
benefit at 2years compared with continued TT.},
keywords = {Checkpoint inhibition (Other) / First-line (Other) /
Melanoma (Other) / Run-in (Other) / Sequence (Other) /
Targeted therapy (Other)},
cin = {ED01 / A370},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)A370-20160331},
pnm = {311 - Zellbiologie und Tumorbiologie (POF4-311)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-311},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37482012},
doi = {10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112941},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/277708},
}