000277788 001__ 277788
000277788 005__ 20240304135720.0
000277788 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1097/RLI.0000000000001006
000277788 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:37490031
000277788 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0020-9996
000277788 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1536-0210
000277788 037__ $$aDKFZ-2023-01502
000277788 041__ $$aEnglish
000277788 082__ $$a610
000277788 1001_ $$aHinsen, Maximilian$$b0
000277788 245__ $$aLung Nodule Detection With Modern Low-Field MRI (0.55 T) in Comparison to CT.
000277788 260__ $$a[Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]$$bOvid$$c2024
000277788 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000277788 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000277788 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1709556998_15773
000277788 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000277788 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000277788 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000277788 500__ $$a2024 Mar 1;59(3):215-222
000277788 520__ $$aThe aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of modern low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for lung nodule detection and to correlate nodule size measurement with computed tomography (CT) as reference.Between November 2020 and July 2021, a prospective clinical trial using low-field MRI at 0.55 T was performed in patients with known pulmonary nodules from a single academic medical center. Every patient underwent MRI and CT imaging on the same day. The primary aim was to evaluate the detection accuracy of pulmonary nodules using MRI with transversal periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction in combination with coronal half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo spin-echo MRI sequences. The secondary outcome was the correlation of the mean lung nodule diameter with CT as reference according to the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman rank correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis were applied to analyze the results.A total of 46 participants (mean age ± SD, 66 ± 11 years; 26 women) were included. In a blinded analysis of 964 lung nodules, the detection accuracy was 100% for those ≥6 mm (126/126), 80% (159/200) for those ≥4-<6 mm, and 23% (147/638) for those <4 mm in MRI compared with reference CT. Spearman correlation coefficient of MRI and CT size measurement was r = 0.87 (P < 0.001), and the mean difference was 0.16 ± 0.9 mm.Modern low-field MRI shows excellent accuracy in lesion detection for lung nodules ≥6 mm and a very strong correlation with CT imaging for size measurement, but could not compete with CT in the detection of small nodules.
000277788 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315$$a315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)$$cPOF4-315$$fPOF IV$$x0
000277788 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
000277788 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)054fd7a5195b75b11fbdc5c360276011$$aNagel, Armin M$$b1$$udkfz
000277788 7001_ $$aMay, Matthias S$$b2
000277788 7001_ $$aWiesmueller, Marco$$b3
000277788 7001_ $$aUder, Michael$$b4
000277788 7001_ $$aHeiss, Rafael$$b5
000277788 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2041543-6$$a10.1097/RLI.0000000000001006$$n3$$p215-222$$tInvestigative radiology$$v59$$x0020-9996$$y2024
000277788 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:277788$$pVDB
000277788 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)054fd7a5195b75b11fbdc5c360276011$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b1$$kDKFZ
000277788 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vBildgebung und Radioonkologie$$x0
000277788 9141_ $$y2023
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2022-11-29
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2022-11-29
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2022-11-29
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0410$$2StatID$$aAllianz-Lizenz$$d2023-10-24$$wger
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2023-10-24
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-10-24
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2023-10-24
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2023-10-24
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2023-10-24
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine$$d2023-10-24
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bINVEST RADIOL : 2022$$d2023-10-24
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-10-24
000277788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bINVEST RADIOL : 2022$$d2023-10-24
000277788 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331$$kE020$$lE020 Med. Physik in der Radiologie$$x0
000277788 980__ $$ajournal
000277788 980__ $$aVDB
000277788 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
000277788 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED