001     277806
005     20240229162349.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100653
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:37502699
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a pmc:PMC10369398
|2 pmc
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2023-01517
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Ehret, Felix
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Outcomes of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild Type Glioblastoma after Re-irradiation.
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam
|c 2023
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1690549497_11047
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Glioblastomas (GBM) are the most common malignant primary brain tumors in adults and have a dismal prognosis. Patients frequently suffer from local tumor recurrences, with limited therapeutic options. Re-irradiation represents a possible intervention, but given the recent 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors, studies in isocitrate dehydrogenase wild type (IDH-wt) cohorts undergoing a second course of radiotherapy remain limited. Herein, we sought to describe our institutional experience and outcomes after GBM IDH-wt re-irradiation.GBM patients with confirmed IDH-wt status undergoing re-irradiation were included in this single-center, retrospective analysis.A total of 88 patients were analyzed. The median clinical and radiographic follow-up periods were 4.6 months and 4.4 months, respectively. Most patients had a Karnofsky performance status of at least 80% (n = 57). The median biologically effective dose and 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) for re-irradiations, assuming an α/β ratio of 10 Gy for GBM, were 51.4 and 42.8 Gy, respectively. In total, 71 deaths were recorded. The median overall survival (OS) was 8.0 months. Multivariable Cox regression of OS revealed a positive influence of gross total resection vs. biopsy or no resection (hazard ratio: 0.43, p = 0.02). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.9 months. The multivariable Cox regression for PFS did not detect any significant factors. No clear evidence of radiation necrosis was recorded during the available follow-up. However, only a minority (n = 4) of patients underwent surgery after re-irradiation, none showing histopathological proof of radiation necrosis.The prognosis for recurrent IDH-wt GBM after re-irradiation is poor. Patients who are amenable and able to undergo re-resection may have a favorable OS. A second course of radiotherapy with a moderate cumulative EQD2 and small- to medium-sized planning target volumes appeared safe regarding the occurrence of radiation necrosis.
536 _ _ |a 899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|c POF4-899
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a Glioblastoma
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a IDH
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Radiation Necrosis
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Radionecrosis
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Radiotherapy
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Re-irradiation
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Wolfgang, Josy
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Allwohn, Luisa
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Onken, Julia
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Wasilewski, David
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Roohani, Siyer
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Oertel, Joachim
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Zips, Daniel
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Kaul, David
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100653
|g Vol. 42, p. 100653 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2885426-3
|p 100653
|t Clinical and translational radiation oncology
|v 42
|y 2023
|x 2405-6308
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:277806
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-16
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-16
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-16
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-16
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b CLIN TRANSL RAD ONCO : 2022
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2023-04-12T14:51:10Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2023-04-12T14:51:10Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2023-04-12T14:51:10Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-23
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)BE01-20160331
|k BE01
|l DKTK Koordinierungsstelle Berlin
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)BE01-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21