% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hrst:277900,
author = {F. Hörst and S. Ting and S.-T. Liffers$^*$ and K. L.
Pomykala and K. Steiger and M. Albertsmeier and M. K. Angele
and S. Lorenzen and M. Quante and W. Weichert$^*$ and J.
Egger and J. Siveke$^*$ and J. Kleesiek$^*$},
title = {{H}istology-{B}ased {P}rediction of {T}herapy {R}esponse to
{N}eoadjuvant {C}hemotherapy for {E}sophageal and
{E}sophagogastric {J}unction {A}denocarcinomas {U}sing
{D}eep {L}earning.},
journal = {JCO clinical cancer informatics},
volume = {7},
number = {7},
issn = {2473-4276},
address = {Alexandria, VA},
publisher = {American Society of Clinical Oncology},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-01560},
pages = {e2300038},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Quantifying treatment response to gastroesophageal junction
(GEJ) adenocarcinomas is crucial to provide an optimal
therapeutic strategy. Routinely taken tissue samples provide
an opportunity to enhance existing positron emission
tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT)-based therapy
response evaluation. Our objective was to investigate if
deep learning (DL) algorithms are capable of predicting the
therapy response of patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma to
neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of histologic tissue
samples.This diagnostic study recruited 67 patients with
I-III GEJ adenocarcinoma from the multicentric nonrandomized
MEMORI trial including three German university hospitals TUM
(University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Munich), LMU (Hospital
of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich), and UME
(University Hospital Essen, Essen). All patients underwent
baseline PET/CT scans and esophageal biopsy before and 14-21
days after treatment initiation. Treatment response was
defined as a $≥35\%$ decrease in SUVmax from baseline.
Several DL algorithms were developed to predict PET/CT-based
responders and nonresponders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
using digitized histopathologic whole slide images
(WSIs).The resulting models were trained on TUM (n = 25
pretherapy, n = 47 on-therapy) patients and evaluated on our
internal validation cohort from LMU and UME (n = 17
pretherapy, n = 15 on-therapy). Compared with multiple
architectures, the best pretherapy network achieves an area
under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of
0.81 $(95\%$ CI, 0.61 to 1.00), an area under the
precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.82 $(95\%$ CI, 0.61 to
1.00), a balanced accuracy of 0.78 $(95\%$ CI, 0.60 to
0.94), and a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.55
$(95\%$ CI, 0.18 to 0.88). The best on-therapy network
achieves an AUROC of 0.84 $(95\%$ CI, 0.64 to 1.00), an
AUPRC of 0.82 $(95\%$ CI, 0.56 to 1.00), a balanced accuracy
of 0.80 $(95\%$ CI, 0.65 to 1.00), and a MCC of 0.71 $(95\%$
CI, 0.38 to 1.00).Our results show that DL algorithms can
predict treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using
WSI with high accuracy even before therapy initiation,
suggesting the presence of predictive morphologic tissue
biomarkers.},
cin = {ED01 / MU01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)MU01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37527475},
doi = {10.1200/CCI.23.00038},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/277900},
}