000277910 001__ 277910
000277910 005__ 20240229155027.0
000277910 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fdgth.2023.1185586
000277910 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:37534029
000277910 0247_ $$2pmc$$apmc:PMC10393256
000277910 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:150994570
000277910 037__ $$aDKFZ-2023-01569
000277910 041__ $$aEnglish
000277910 082__ $$a610
000277910 1001_ $$aMcDermott, Kevin T$$b0
000277910 245__ $$aDigital interventions to moderate physical inactivity and/or nutrition in young people: a Cancer Prevention Europe overview of systematic reviews.
000277910 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Media$$c2023
000277910 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000277910 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000277910 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1691067190_20938$$xReview Article
000277910 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000277910 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000277910 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000277910 520__ $$aStrategies to increase physical activity (PA) and improve nutrition would contribute to substantial health benefits in the population, including reducing the risk of several types of cancers. The increasing accessibility of digital technologies mean that these tools could potentially facilitate the improvement of health behaviours among young people.We conducted a review of systematic reviews to assess the available evidence on digital interventions aimed at increasing physical activity and good nutrition in sub-populations of young people (school-aged children, college/university students, young adults only (over 18 years) and both adolescent and young adults (<25 years)).Searches for systematic reviews were conducted across relevant databases including KSR Evidence (www.ksrevidence.com), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE; CRD). Records were independently screened by title and abstract by two reviewers and those deemed eligible were obtained for full text screening. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) tool. We employed a narrative analysis and developed evidence gap maps.Twenty-four reviews were included with at least one for each sub-population and employing a range of digital interventions. The quality of evidence was limited with only one of the 24 of reviews overall judged as low RoB. Definitions of 'digital intervention' greatly varied across systematic reviews with some reported interventions fitting into more than one category (i.e., an internet intervention could also be a mobile phone or computer intervention), however definitions as reported in the relevant reviews were used. No reviews reported cancer incidence or related outcomes. Available evidence was limited both by sub-population and type of intervention, but evidence was most pronounced in school-aged children. In school-aged children eHealth interventions, defined as school-based programmes delivered by the internet, computers, tablets, mobile technology, or tele-health methods, improved outcomes. Accelerometer-measured (Standardised Mean Difference [SMD] 0.33, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.05 to 0.61) and self-reported (SMD: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.23) PA increased, as did fruit and vegetable intake (SMD: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.19) (review rated as low RoB, minimal to considerable heterogeneity across results). No difference was reported for consumption of fat post-intervention (SMD: -0.06, 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.03) or sugar sweetened beverages(SSB) and snack consumption combined post-intervention (SMD: -0.02, 95% CI:-0.10 to 0.06),or at the follow up (studies reported 2 weeks to 36 months follow-up) after the intervention (SMD:-0.06, 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.03) (review rated low ROB, minimal to substantial heterogeneity across results). Smartphone based interventions utilising Short Messaging Service (SMS), app or combined approaches also improved PA measured using objective and subjective methods (SMD: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.77) when compared to controls, with increases in total PA [weighted mean difference (WMD) 32.35 min per day, 95% CI: 10.36 to 54.33] and in daily steps (WMD: 1,185, 95% CI: 303 to 2,068) (review rated as high RoB, moderate to substantial heterogeneity across results). For all results, interpretation has limitations in terms of RoB and presence of unexplained heterogeneity.This review of reviews has identified limited evidence that suggests some potential for digital interventions to increase PA and, to lesser extent, improve nutrition in school-aged children. However, effects can be small and based on less robust evidence. The body of evidence is characterised by a considerable level of heterogeneity, unclear/overlapping populations and intervention definitions, and a low methodological quality of systematic reviews. The heterogeneity across studies is further complicated when the age (older vs. more recent), interactivity (feedback/survey vs. no/less feedback/surveys), and accessibility (type of device) of the digital intervention is considered. This underscores the difficulty in synthesising evidence in a field with rapidly evolving technology and the resulting challenges in recommending the use of digital technology in public health. There is an urgent need for further research using contemporary technology and appropriate methods.
000277910 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313$$a313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)$$cPOF4-313$$fPOF IV$$x0
000277910 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
000277910 650_7 $$2Other$$acancer
000277910 650_7 $$2Other$$adiet
000277910 650_7 $$2Other$$adigital health
000277910 650_7 $$2Other$$aevidence appraisal
000277910 650_7 $$2Other$$aevidence synthesis
000277910 650_7 $$2Other$$aphysical activity
000277910 650_7 $$2Other$$apublic health
000277910 650_7 $$2Other$$asystematic reviews
000277910 7001_ $$aNoake, Caro$$b1
000277910 7001_ $$aWolff, Robert$$b2
000277910 7001_ $$aBauld, Linda$$b3
000277910 7001_ $$aEspina, Carolina$$b4
000277910 7001_ $$aFoucaud, Jérôme$$b5
000277910 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)a0c2037d9054be26907a05ae520d5756$$aSteindorf, Karen$$b6$$udkfz
000277910 7001_ $$aThorat, Mangesh A$$b7
000277910 7001_ $$aWeijenberg, Matty P$$b8
000277910 7001_ $$aSchüz, Joachim$$b9
000277910 7001_ $$aKleijnen, Jos$$b10
000277910 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)3017798-4$$a10.3389/fdgth.2023.1185586$$gVol. 5, p. 1185586$$p1185586$$tFrontiers in digital health$$v5$$x2673-253X$$y2023
000277910 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:277910$$pVDB
000277910 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)a0c2037d9054be26907a05ae520d5756$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b6$$kDKFZ
000277910 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vKrebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention$$x0
000277910 9141_ $$y2023
000277910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-05-13T10:45:31Z
000277910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-05-13T10:45:31Z
000277910 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV$$2V:(DE-HGF)$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)$$bDOAJ$$d2021-05-13T10:45:31Z
000277910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2022-11-17
000277910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2022-11-17
000277910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-08-19
000277910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2023-08-19
000277910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central$$d2023-08-19
000277910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Anonymous peer review$$d2021-05-13T10:45:31Z
000277910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-08-19
000277910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0112$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bEmerging Sources Citation Index$$d2023-08-19
000277910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2023-08-19
000277910 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)C110-20160331$$kC110$$lBewegung, Präventionsforschung und Krebs$$x0
000277910 980__ $$ajournal
000277910 980__ $$aVDB
000277910 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)C110-20160331
000277910 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED