% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{deBortoli:278343,
author = {T. de Bortoli and M. Benary and P. Horak$^*$ and M. Lamping
and S. Stintzing$^*$ and I. Tinhofer$^*$ and S. Leyvraz and
R. Schäfer$^*$ and F. Klauschen$^*$ and U. Keller$^*$ and
A. Stenzinger$^*$ and S. Fröhling$^*$ and R. Kurzrock and
U. Keilholz$^*$ and D. T. Rieke$^*$ and I. Jelas},
title = {{T}umour mutational burden and survival with molecularly
matched therapy.},
journal = {European journal of cancer},
volume = {190},
issn = {0014-2964},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-01600},
pages = {112925},
year = {2023},
abstract = {The impact of tumour mutational burden (TMB) on outcome
with molecularly matched therapy is unknown. Higher TMB
could predict resistance to molecularly matched therapy
through co-occurring driver mutations.One hundred and four
patients with advanced cancers underwent molecular profiling
in the DKTK-MASTER program. Fifty-five patients received
systemic therapy excluding immunotherapy. Patients with
molecularly matched (n = 35) or non-molecularly informed
therapy (n = 20) were analysed for TMB and survival. Results
were validated in an independent cohort of patients
receiving molecularly matched (n = 68) or non-molecularly
informed therapy (n = 40). Co-occurring driver mutations and
TMB were analysed in the exploratory cohort and The Cancer
Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets.Patients were stratified by the
median TMB of 1.67 mutations per Megabase (mut/Mb) of 35
patients receiving molecularly matched therapy into TMB-high
or TMB-low groups. Median overall survival (4 months $[95\%$
CI, 3.3-7.6] versus 12.8 months $[95\%$ CI, 10-not reached],
p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (1.8 months $[95\%$
CI, 1.1-3.7] versus 7.9 months $[95\%$ CI, 2.8-17.0], p =
0.003) were significantly shorter in the TMB-high group
compared to the TMB-low group. In the validation cohort,
shorter OS and PFS were identified in the TMB-high group
(TMB cut-off of 4 mut/Mb) treated with molecularly matched
therapy. No differences were observed in patients receiving
non-molecularly informed systemic therapy. A significant
correlation between co-occurring driver mutations and TMB (n
= 104, r = 0.78 $[95\%$ CI, 0.68-0.85], p < 0.001) was found
in the exploratory cohort as well as the majority (24/33) of
TCGA studies.A high TMB was associated with unfavourable
outcome in patients receiving molecularly matched therapy,
indicating untargeted resistance pathways. Therefore, TMB
should be further investigated as a predictive biomarker in
precision oncology programs.},
keywords = {Molecular tumour board (Other) / Personalised therapy
(Other) / Precision oncology (Other) / Tumour mutational
burden (Other)},
cin = {B340 / BE01 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)B340-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)BE01-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {312 - Funktionelle und strukturelle Genomforschung
(POF4-312)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-312},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37544709},
doi = {10.1016/j.ejca.2023.05.013},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/278343},
}