% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Guimares:278370,
author = {L. M. Guimarães and D. Baumhoer and V. Andrei and D.
Friedel$^*$ and C. Koelsche$^*$ and R. S. Gomez and A. von
Deimling$^*$ and C. C. Gomes},
title = {{DNA} methylation profile discriminates sporadic giant cell
granulomas of the jaws and cherubism from their giant
cell-rich histological mimics.},
journal = {The journal of pathology: clinical research},
volume = {9},
number = {6},
issn = {2056-4538},
address = {Chichester},
publisher = {Wiley},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-01620},
pages = {464-474},
year = {2023},
note = {2023 Nov;9(6):464-474},
abstract = {Sporadic giant cell granulomas (GCGs) of the jaws and
cherubism-associated giant cell lesions share
histopathological features and microscopic diagnosis alone
can be challenging. Additionally, GCG can morphologically
closely resemble other giant cell-rich lesions, including
non-ossifying fibroma (NOF), aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC),
giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), and chondroblastoma. The
epigenetic basis of these giant cell-rich tumours is unclear
and DNA methylation profiling has been shown to be
clinically useful for the diagnosis of other tumour types.
Therefore, we aimed to assess the DNA methylation profile of
central and peripheral sporadic GCG and cherubism to test
whether DNA methylation patterns can help to distinguish
them. Additionally, we compared the DNA methylation profile
of these lesions with those of other giant cell-rich mimics
to investigate if the microscopic similarities extend to the
epigenetic level. DNA methylation analysis was performed for
central (n = 10) and peripheral (n = 10) GCG, cherubism (n =
6), NOF (n = 10), ABC (n = 16), GCTB (n = 9), and
chondroblastoma (n = 10) using the Infinium Human
Methylation EPIC Chip. Central and peripheral sporadic GCG
and cherubism share a related DNA methylation pattern, with
those of peripheral GCG and cherubism appearing slightly
distinct, while central GCG shows overlap with both of the
former. NOF, ABC, GCTB, and chondroblastoma, on the other
hand, have distinct methylation patterns. The global and
enhancer-associated CpG DNA methylation values showed a
similar distribution pattern among central and peripheral
GCG and cherubism, with cherubism showing the lowest and
peripheral GCG having the highest median values. By
contrast, promoter regions showed a different methylation
distribution pattern, with cherubism showing the highest
median values. In conclusion, DNA methylation profiling is
currently not capable of clearly distinguishing sporadic and
cherubism-associated giant cell lesions. Conversely, it
could discriminate sporadic GCG of the jaws from their giant
cell-rich mimics (NOF, ABC, GCTB, and chondroblastoma).},
keywords = {DNA methylation (Other) / aneurysmal bone cyst (Other) /
bone pathology (Other) / cherubism (Other) / chondroblastoma
(Other) / copy number analysis (Other) / epigenetics (Other)
/ giant cell granulomas (Other) / giant cell tumour of bone
(Other) / non-ossifying fibroma (Other)},
cin = {B300 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)B300-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {312 - Funktionelle und strukturelle Genomforschung
(POF4-312)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-312},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37555357},
doi = {10.1002/cjp2.337},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/278370},
}