% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Constantinescu:278422,
author = {A.-E. Constantinescu and C. J. Bull and N. Jones and R.
Mitchell and K. Burrows and N. Dimou and S. Bézieau and H.
Brenner$^*$ and D. D. Buchanan and M. D'Amato and M. A.
Jenkins and V. Moreno and R. K. Pai and C. Y. Um and E.
White and N. Murphy and M. Gunter and N. J. Timpson and J.
R. Huyghe and E. E. Vincent},
title = {{C}irculating white blood cell traits and colorectal cancer
risk: {A} {M}endelian randomisation study.},
journal = {International journal of cancer},
volume = {154},
number = {1},
issn = {0020-7136},
address = {Bognor Regis},
publisher = {Wiley-Liss},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-01656},
pages = {94-103},
year = {2024},
note = {2024 Jan 1;154(1):94-103},
abstract = {Observational studies have suggested a protective role for
eosinophils in colorectal cancer (CRC) development and
implicated neutrophils, but the causal relationships remain
unclear. Here, we aimed to estimate the causal effect of
circulating white blood cell (WBC) counts (N = ~550 000) for
basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, lymphocytes and
neutrophils on CRC risk (N = 52 775 cases and 45 940
controls) using Mendelian randomisation (MR). For
comparison, we also examined this relationship using
individual-level data from UK Biobank (4043 incident CRC
cases and 332 773 controls) in a longitudinal cohort
analysis. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) MR analysis
suggested a protective effect of increased basophil count
and eosinophil count on CRC risk [OR per 1-SD increase:
0.88, $95\%$ CI: 0.78-0.99, P = .04; OR: 0.93, $95\%$ CI:
0.88-0.98, P = .01]. The protective effect of eosinophils
remained [OR per 1-SD increase: 0.88, $95\%$ CI: 0.80-0.97,
P = .01] following adjustments for all other WBC subtypes,
to account for genetic correlation between the traits, using
multivariable MR. A protective effect of increased
lymphocyte count on CRC risk was also found [OR: 0.84,
$95\%$ CI: 0.76-0.93, P = 6.70e-4] following adjustment.
Consistent with MR results, a protective effect for
eosinophils in the cohort analysis in the fully adjusted
model [RR per 1-SD increase: 0.96, $95\%$ CI: 0.93-0.99, P =
.02] and following adjustment for the other WBC subtypes
[RR: 0.96, $95\%$ CI: 0.93-0.99, P = .001] was observed. Our
study implicates peripheral blood immune cells, in
particular eosinophils and lymphocytes, in CRC development,
highlighting a need for mechanistic studies to interrogate
these relationships.},
keywords = {Mendelian randomisation (Other) / UK biobank (Other) /
White blood cell count (Other) / colorectal cancer (Other) /
eosinophils (Other)},
cin = {C070 / C120 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37578112},
doi = {10.1002/ijc.34691},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/278422},
}