% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence % of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older. % Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or % “biber”. @ARTICLE{Gelderblom:278647, author = {H. Gelderblom and R. L. Jones and J.-Y. Blay and S. George and M. von Mehren and J. R. Zalcberg and Y.-K. Kang and A. A. Razak and J. Trent and S. Attia and A. Le Cesne and B. L. Siontis and D. Goldstein and K. Boye and C. Sanchez and N. Steeghs and P. Rutkowski and M. Druta and C. Serrano and N. Somaiah and P. Chi and B. Harrow and C. Becker and W. Reichmann and M. L. Sherman and R. Ruiz-Soto and M. C. Heinrich and S. Bauer}, collaboration = {I. investigators}, title = {{P}atient-reported outcomes and tolerability in patients receiving ripretinib versus sunitinib after treatment with imatinib in {INTRIGUE}, a phase 3, open-label study.}, journal = {European journal of cancer}, volume = {192}, issn = {0014-2964}, address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]}, publisher = {Elsevier}, reportid = {DKFZ-2023-01691}, pages = {113245}, year = {2023}, abstract = {In the INTRIGUE trial, ripretinib showed no significant difference versus sunitinib in progression-free survival for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) previously treated with imatinib. We compared the impact of these treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).Patients were randomised 1:1 to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or once-daily sunitinib 50 mg (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire at day (D)1, and D29 of all cycles until treatment discontinuation. Change from baseline was calculated. Time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST) was estimated as the mean number of days without progression, death, or grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events per patient over 1 year of follow-up.Questionnaire completion at baseline was $88.1\%$ (199/226) for ripretinib and $87.7\%$ (199/227) for sunitinib and remained high for enrolled patients throughout treatment. Patients receiving sunitinib demonstrated within-cycle variation in self-reported HRQoL, corresponding to the on/off dosing regimen. Patients receiving ripretinib reported better HRQoL at D29 assessments than patients receiving sunitinib on all scales except constipation. HRQoL was similar between treatments at D1 assessments, following 2 weeks without treatment for sunitinib patients. TWiST was greater for ripretinib patients (173 versus 126 days).Patients receiving ripretinib experienced better HRQoL than patients receiving sunitinib during the dosing period and similar HRQoL to patients who had not received sunitinib for 2 weeks for all QLQ-C30 domains except constipation. Ripretinib may provide clinically meaningful benefit to patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib.}, keywords = {Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (Other) / Patient reported outcome measures (Other) / Protein kinase inhibitors (Other) / Quality of life (Other)}, cin = {ED01}, ddc = {610}, cid = {I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331}, pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)}, pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899}, typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16}, pubmed = {pmid:37598656}, doi = {10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113245}, url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/278647}, }