% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Schneider:282461,
author = {T. Schneider and F. Zwicker$^*$ and P. E. Huber$^*$ and J.
Debus$^*$ and H. Hauswald$^*$},
title = {{I}n {V}itro {C}arbon {I}on {B}eam and {G}emcitabine
{C}hemoradiation in a {M}ucoepidermoid {C}arcinoma {C}ell
{L}ine.},
journal = {In vivo},
volume = {37},
number = {5},
issn = {0258-851x},
address = {Kapandriti, Attiki},
publisher = {IIAR},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-01776},
pages = {1951 - 1959},
year = {2023},
note = {#EA:E055#LA:E055#},
abstract = {To determine the interaction of gemcitabine in
chemoradiotherapy with heavy carbon ions in vitro in a
mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) cell line.The human lymphatic
MEC metastasis cell line NCI-H292 was used. The cells were
treated with photons, carbon ions, and gemcitabine. Survival
fractions (SF), apoptosis, and cell cycle progression were
analyzed. A paired two-sided t-test was used. Significance
was defined as p<0.05.Cell proliferation assays showed a
significant reduction in SF for combined photon
chemoradiation versus photons only. The linear-quadratic
fits of combined therapy with carbon ion dose of 0 to 2.5 Gy
led to reductions of mean $15\%$ in SF. The LD50 (lethal
radiation dose required to reduce cell survival by $50\%)$
for carbon ions only was 0.7 Gy and for carbon ions with
gemcitabine 0.6 Gy. The LD50 for photons (with gemcitabine)
was 2.8 Gy (2.0 Gy) and for carbon ions (with gemcitabine)
0.7 Gy (0.6 Gy), resulting in a relative biological
effectiveness at $10\%$ cell survival (RBE10) of 3.0 (2.7).
Carbon ions and photons reduced S phase and increased G2/M
phase cell distribution. Isolated treatment with gemcitabine
as well as combination with photons led to prolonged S phase
transit, whereas combined treatment with carbon ions led to
early accumulation in G2/M phase. A significant increase in
the sub-G1 population as a hint of relevant number of
apoptotic cells was not observed.Gemcitabine showed
radiosensitizing effects in combination with photons. The
combination of gemcitabine and carbon ions had independent
additive effects. Carbon ions only had a RBE10 of 3.0,
compared to photons only. The combination of gemcitabine,
photon, and carbon ions in patients with MEC seems promising
and warrants further investigation.},
keywords = {Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (Other) / carbon ion beam therapy
(Other) / chemoradiation (Other) / head and neck (Other) /
in vitro (Other) / ion beam therapy (Other) / particle beam
therapy (Other) / radiotherapy (Other)},
cin = {E055 / HD01 / E050},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E055-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37652498},
doi = {10.21873/invivo.13291},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/282461},
}