001     283158
005     20240304140603.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/mp.16754
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:37748042
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0094-2405
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1522-8541
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2473-4209
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2023-01944
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Lysakovski, Peter
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Development and validation of MonteRay, a fast Monte Carlo dose engine for carbon ion beam radiotherapy.
260 _ _ |a College Park, Md.
|c 2024
|b AAPM
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1709557518_15775
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a #LA:E210# / 2024 Feb;51(2):1433-1449
520 _ _ |a Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are considered the gold-standard for accuracy in radiotherapy dose calculation; so far however, no commercial treatment planning system (TPS) provides a fast MC for supporting clinical practice in carbon ion therapy.To extend and validate the in-house developed fast MC dose engine MonteRay for carbon ion therapy, including physical and biological dose calculation.MonteRay is a CPU MC dose calculation engine written in C++ that is capable of simulating therapeutic proton, helium and carbon ion beams. In this work, development steps taken to include carbon ions in MonteRay are presented. Dose distributions computed with MonteRay are evaluated using a comprehensive validation dataset, including various measurements (pristine Bragg peaks, spread out Bragg peaks in water and behind an anthropomorphic phantom) and simulations of a patient plan. The latter includes both physical and biological dose comparisons. Runtimes of MonteRay were evaluated against those of FLUKA MC on a standard benchmark problem.Dosimetric comparisons between MonteRay and measurements demonstrated good agreement. In terms of pristine Bragg peaks, mean errors between simulated and measured integral depth dose distributions were between -2.3% and +2.7%. Comparing SOBPs at 5, 12.5 and 20 cm depth, mean absolute relative dose differences were 0.9%, 0.7% and 1.6% respectively. Comparison against measurements behind an anthropomorphic head phantom revealed mean absolute dose differences of 1.2 % ± 1.1 % $1.2\% \pm 1.1\;\% \;$ with global 3%/3 mm 3D-γ passing rates of 99.3%, comparable to those previously reached with FLUKA (98.9%). Comparisons against dose predictions computed with the clinical treatment planning tool RayStation 11B for a meningioma patient plan revealed excellent local 1%/1 mm 3D-γ passing rates of 98% for physical and 94% for biological dose. In terms of runtime, MonteRay achieved speedups against reference FLUKA simulations ranging from 14× to 72×, depending on the beam's energy and the step size chosen.Validations against clinical dosimetric measurements in homogeneous and heterogeneous scenarios and clinical TPS calculations have proven the validity of the physical models implemented in MonteRay. To conclude, MonteRay is viable as a fast secondary MC engine for supporting clinical practice in proton, helium and carbon ion radiotherapy.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|c POF4-315
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a carbon ions
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a dose calculation
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a fast Monte Carlo
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a radiotherapy
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Kopp, Benedikt
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Tessonnier, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-He78)b907c008f5a279f1f3539ca77ec858dc
|b 2
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Mein, Stewart
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Ferrari, Alfredo
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Haberer, Thomas
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Debus, Jürgen
|0 P:(DE-He78)8714da4e45acfa36ce87c291443a9218
|b 6
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Mairani, Andrea
|0 P:(DE-He78)8d6c2aceda79e88defe1e8c0fcc39d59
|b 7
|e Last author
|u dkfz
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/mp.16754
|g p. mp.16754
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1466421-5
|n 2
|p 1433-1449
|t Medical physics
|v 51
|y 2024
|x 0094-2405
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:283158
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-He78)b907c008f5a279f1f3539ca77ec858dc
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-He78)8714da4e45acfa36ce87c291443a9218
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-He78)8d6c2aceda79e88defe1e8c0fcc39d59
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 _ _ |a DEAL Wiley
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3001
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-12
|w ger
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-12
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b MED PHYS : 2022
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2023-10-21
920 2 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E210-20160331
|k E210
|l E210 KKE Translationale Radioonkologie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E210-20160331
|k E210
|l E210 KKE Translationale Radioonkologie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
|k HD01
|l DKTK HD zentral
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331
|k E050
|l E050 KKE Strahlentherapie
|x 2
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E210-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21