% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wen:284381,
author = {P. Y. Wen and M. van den Bent and G. Youssef and T. F.
Cloughesy and B. M. Ellingson and M. Weller and E. Galanis
and D. P. Barboriak and J. de Groot and M. R. Gilbert and R.
Huang and A. B. Lassman and M. Mehta and A. M. Molinaro and
M. Preusser and R. Rahman and L. K. Shankar and R. Stupp and
J. E. Villanueva-Meyer and W. Wick$^*$ and D. R. Macdonald
and D. A. Reardon and M. A. Vogelbaum and S. M. Chang},
title = {{RANO} 2.0: {U}pdate to the {R}esponse {A}ssessment in
{N}euro-{O}ncology {C}riteria for {H}igh- and {L}ow-{G}rade
{G}liomas in {A}dults.},
journal = {Journal of clinical oncology},
volume = {41},
number = {33},
issn = {0732-183X},
address = {Alexandria, Va.},
publisher = {American Society of Clinical Oncology},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-01975},
pages = {5187-5199},
year = {2023},
note = {2023 Nov 20;41(33):5187-5199},
abstract = {The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria
for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas
(RANO-LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response
assessment in glioma trials. Over time, some limitations of
these criteria were identified, and challenges emerged
regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO)
or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria.Informed by data
from studies evaluating the different criteria, updates to
the RANO criteria are proposed (RANO 2.0).We recommend a
standard set of criteria for both high- and low-grade
gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the
treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed
setting, the postradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI), rather than the postsurgical MRI, will be used as the
baseline for comparison with subsequent scans. Since the
incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks after
radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of
progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or
histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, are
required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation
scans are not mandatory after this period nor for the
evaluation of treatment for recurrent tumors. For treatments
with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory
confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is highly
recommended. The primary measurement remains the maximum
cross-sectional area of tumor (two-dimensional) but
volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH wild-type
glioblastoma, the nonenhancing disease will no longer be
evaluated except when assessing response to antiangiogenic
agents. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant
nonenhancing component, clinical trials may require
evaluating both the enhancing and nonenhancing tumor
components for response assessment.The revised RANO 2.0
criteria refine response assessment in gliomas.},
cin = {B320 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)B320-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {312 - Funktionelle und strukturelle Genomforschung
(POF4-312)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-312},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37774317},
doi = {10.1200/JCO.23.01059},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/284381},
}