% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Klotz:284632,
author = {D. M. Klotz$^*$ and T. Link$^*$ and P. Wimberger$^*$ and J.
D. Kuhlmann$^*$},
title = {{A} predictive and prognostic model for surgical outcome
and prognosis in ovarian cancer computed by
clinico-pathological and serological parameters ({CA}125,
{HE}4, mesothelin).},
journal = {Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine},
volume = {62},
number = {3},
issn = {1434-6621},
address = {Berlin [u.a.]},
publisher = {De Gruyter},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-02039},
pages = {530-539},
year = {2023},
note = {2023 Oct 11;62(3):530-539},
abstract = {Numerous prognostic models have been proposed for ovarian
cancer, extending from single serological factors to complex
gene-expression signatures. Nonetheless, these models have
not been routinely translated into clinical practice. We
constructed a robust and readily calculable model for
predicting surgical outcome and prognosis of ovarian cancer
patients by exploiting commonly available
clinico-pathological factors and three selected serum
parameters.Serum CA125, human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and
mesothelin (MSL) were quantified by Lumipulse® G
chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Fujirebio) in a total
of 342 serum samples from 190 ovarian cancer patients,
including 152 paired pre- and post-operative
samples.Detection of pre-operative HE4 and CA125 was the
optimal marker combination for blood-based prediction of
surgical outcome (AUC=0.86). We constructed a prognostic
model, computed by serum levels of pre-operative CA125,
post-operative HE4, post-operative MSL and surgical outcome.
Prognostic performance of our model was superior to any of
these parameters alone and was independent from BRCA1/2
mutational status. We subsequently transformed our model
into a prognostic risk index, stratifying patients as 'lower
risk' or 'higher risk'. In 'higher risk' patients, relapse
or death was predicted with an AUC of 0.89 and they had a
significantly shorter progression free survival (HR: 9.74;
95 $\%$ CI: 5.95-15.93; p<0.0001) and overall survival (HR:
5.62; 95 $\%$ CI: 3.16-9.99; p<0.0001) compared to 'lower
risk' patients.We present a robust predictive/prognostic
model for ovarian cancer, which could readily be implemented
into routine diagnostics in order to identify ovarian cancer
patients at high risk of recurrence.},
keywords = {CA125 (Other) / HE4 (Other) / mesothelin (Other) / ovarian
cancer (Other) / prognostic model (Other)},
cin = {DD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)DD01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37816681},
doi = {10.1515/cclm-2023-0314},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/284632},
}