% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Handke:284823,
author = {A. Handke$^*$ and C. Kesch$^*$ and W. P. Fendler$^*$ and T.
Telli$^*$ and Y. Liu and A. Hakansson and E. Davicioni and
J. Hughes and H. Song and K. Lueckerath$^*$ and K.
Herrmann$^*$ and B. Hadaschik$^*$ and R. Seifert$^*$},
title = {{A}nalysing the tumor transcriptome of prostate cancer to
predict efficacy of {L}u-{PSMA} therapy.},
journal = {Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer},
volume = {11},
number = {10},
issn = {2051-1426},
address = {London},
publisher = {BioMed Central},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-02119},
pages = {e007354},
year = {2023},
abstract = {177Lu-PSMA ([177Lu]Lutetium-PSMA-617) therapy is an
effective treatment option for patients with prostate
specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic
castration-resistant prostate cancer, but still shows a
non-responder rate of approximately $30\%.$ Combination
regimes of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition and
concomitant 177Lu-PSMA therapy have been proposed to
increase the response rate. However, the interplay of immune
landscape and 177Lu-PSMA therapy efficacy is poorly
understood.Between March 2018 and December 2021, a total of
168 patients were referred to 177Lu-PSMA therapy in our
department and received a mean total dose of 21.9 GBq (three
cycles in mean). All patients received baseline PSMA
positron emission tomography to assess the PSMA uptake. The
histopathological specimen of the primary prostate tumor was
available with sufficient RNA passing quality control steps
for genomic analysis in n=23 patients. In this subset of
patients, tumor RNA transcriptomic analyses assessed 74
immune-related features in total, out of which n=24
signatures were not co-correlated and investigated further
for outcome prognostication.In the subset of patients who
received 177Lu-PSMA therapy, PD-L1 was not significantly
associated with OS (HR per SD change $(95\%$ CI) 0.74 (0.42
to 1.30); SD: 0.18; p=0.29). In contrast, PD-L2 signature
was positively associated with longer OS (HR per SD change
0.46 $(95\%$ CI 0.29 to 0.74); SD: 0.24; p=0.001; median OS
17.2 vs 5.7 months in higher vs lower PD-L2 patients). In
addition, PD-L2 signature correlated with PSA-response
(ϱ=-0.46; p=0.04). The PD-L2 signature association with OS
was significantly moderated by L-Lactatdehydrogenase (LDH)
levels (Cox model interaction p=0.01).Higher PD-L2 signature
might be associated with a better response to 177Lu-PSMA
therapy and warrants further studies investigating
additional immunotherapy. In contrast, PD-L1 was not
associated with outcome. The protective effect of PD-L2
signature might be present only in men with lower LDH
levels.},
keywords = {Prostatic Neoplasms (Other) / Radiotherapy (Other) / Tumor
Biomarkers (Other)},
cin = {ED01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37857524},
doi = {10.1136/jitc-2023-007354},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/284823},
}