% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hfel:285223,
author = {S. Höfel and P. Liebig and M. K. Fix and M. Drescher and
F. Zwicker$^*$},
title = {{A}dapting a practical {EPR} dosimetry protocol to measure
output factors in small fields with alanine.},
journal = {Journal of applied clinical medical physics},
volume = {24},
number = {12},
issn = {1526-9914},
address = {Reston, Va.},
publisher = {ACMP},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-02258},
pages = {e14191},
year = {2023},
note = {#LA:E055# / 2023 Dec;24(12):e14191},
abstract = {Modern radiotherapy techniques often deliver small
radiation fields. In this work, a practical Electron
Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) dosimetry protocol is adapted
and applied to measure output factors (OF) in small fields
of a 6 MV radiotherapy system. Correction factors and
uncertainties are presented and OFs are compared to the
values obtained by following TRS-483 using an ionization
chamber (IC).Irradiations were performed at 10 cm depth
inside a water phantom positioned at 90 cm source to surface
distance with a 6 MV flattening filter free photon beam of a
Halcyon radiotherapy system. OFs for different nominal field
sizes (1 × 1, 2 × 2, 3 × 3, 4 × 4, normalized to 10 ×
10 cm2 ) were determined with a PinPoint 3D (PTW 31022) IC
following TRS-483 as well as with alanine pellets with a
diameter of 4 mm and a height of 2.4 mm. EPR readout was
performed with a benchtop X-band spectrometer. Correction
factors due to volume averaging and due to positional
uncertainties were derived from 2D film measurements.OFs
obtained from both dosimeter types agreed within $0.7\%$
after applying corrections for the volume averaging effect.
For the used alanine pellets, volume averaging correction
factors of 1.030(2) for the 1 × 1 cm2 field and <1.002 for
the larger field sizes were determined. The correction
factor for positional uncertainties of 1 mm was in the order
of 1.018 for the 1 × 1 cm2 field. Combined relative
standard uncertainties uc for the OFs resulting from alanine
measurements were estimated to be below $1.5\%$ for all
field sizes. For IC measurements, uc was estimated to be
below $1.0\%.A$ practical EPR dosimetry protocol is
adaptable for precisely measuring OFs in small fields down
to 1 × 1 cm2 . It is recommended to consider the effect of
positional uncertainties for field sizes <2 × 2 cm2 .},
keywords = {EPR dosimetry (Other) / alanine (Other) / density effect
(Other) / output factor (Other) / small field (Other) /
volume effect (Other)},
cin = {E055},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E055-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37922380},
doi = {10.1002/acm2.14191},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/285223},
}