% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{EmdeRajaratnam:285713,
author = {M. Emde-Rajaratnam and S. Beck and V. Benes and H.
Salwender and U. Bertsch and C. Scheid and M. Hänel and K.
Weisel and T. Hielscher$^*$ and M. S. Raab and H.
Goldschmidt and A. Jauch and K. Maes and E. De Bruyne and E.
Menu and K. De Veirman and J. Moreaux and K. Vanderkerken
and A. Seckinger and D. Hose},
title = {{RNA}-sequencing based first choice of treatment and
determination of risk in multiple myeloma.},
journal = {Frontiers in immunology},
volume = {14},
issn = {1664-3224},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-02521},
pages = {1286700},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Immunotherapeutic targets in multiple myeloma (MM) have
variable expression height and are partly expressed in
subfractions of patients only. With increasing numbers of
available compounds, strategies for appropriate choice of
targets (combinations) are warranted. Simultaneously, risk
assessment is advisable as patient's life expectancy varies
between months and decades.We first assess feasibility of
RNA-sequencing in a multicenter trial (GMMG-MM5, n=604
patients). Next, we use a clinical routine cohort of
untreated symptomatic myeloma patients undergoing autologous
stem cell transplantation (n=535, median follow-up (FU) 64
months) to perform RNA-sequencing, gene expression profiling
(GEP), and iFISH by ten-probe panel on CD138-purified
malignant plasma cells. We subsequently compare target
expression to plasma cell precursors, MGUS (n=59),
asymptomatic (n=142) and relapsed (n=69) myeloma patients,
myeloma cell lines (n=26), and between longitudinal samples
(MM vs. relapsed MM). Data are validated using the
independent MMRF CoMMpass-cohort (n=767, FU 31
months).RNA-sequencing is feasible in $90.8\%$ of patients
(GMMG-MM5). Actionable immune-oncological targets (n=19) can
be divided in those expressed in all normal and $>99\%$ of
MM-patients (CD38, SLAMF7, BCMA, GPRC5D, FCRH5, TACI, CD74,
CD44, CD37, CD79B), those with expression loss in
subfractions of MM-patients (BAFF-R $[81.3\%],$ CD19
$[57.9\%],$ CD20 $[82.8\%],$ CD22 $[28.4\%]),$ aberrantly
expressed in MM (NY-ESO1/2 $[12\%],$ MUC1 $[12.7\%],$ CD30
$[4.9\%],$ mutated BRAF V600E/K $[2.1\%]),$ and
resistance-conveying target-mutations e.g., against part but
not all BCMA-directed treatments. Risk is assessable
regarding proliferation, translated GEP- (UAMS70-, SKY92-,
RS-score) and de novo (LfM-HRS) defined risk scores. LfM-HRS
delineates three groups of $40\%,$ $38\%,$ and $22\%$ of
patients with 5-year and 12-year survival rates of $84\%$
$(49\%),$ $67\%$ $(18\%),$ and $32\%$ $(0\%).$ R-ISS and
RNA-sequencing identify partially overlapping patient
populations, with R-ISS missing, e.g., $30\%$ (22/72) of
highly proliferative myeloma.RNA-sequencing based assessment
of risk and targets for first choice treatment is possible
in clinical routine.},
keywords = {RNA-sequencing (Other) / immunotherapeutic targets (Other)
/ multiple myeloma (Other) / personalized treatment (Other)
/ proliferation (Other) / risk-adapted treatment (Other) /
survival (Other)},
cin = {C060},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:38035078},
pmc = {pmc:PMC10684778},
doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2023.1286700},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/285713},
}