% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Jiang:286376,
author = {X. Jiang and M. Hoffmeister$^*$ and H. Brenner$^*$ and H.
S. Muti and T. Yuan$^*$ and S. Foersch and N. P. West and A.
Brobeil and J. Jonnagaddala and N. Hawkins and R. L. Ward
and T. Brinker$^*$ and O. L. Saldanha and J. Ke and W.
Müller and H. I. Grabsch and P. Quirke and D. Truhn and J.
N. Kather},
title = {{E}nd-to-end prognostication in colorectal cancer by deep
learning: a retrospective, multicentre study.},
journal = {The lancet / Digital health},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
issn = {2589-7500},
address = {London},
publisher = {The Lancet},
reportid = {DKFZ-2023-02779},
pages = {e33 - e43},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Precise prognosis prediction in patients with colorectal
cancer (ie, forecasting survival) is pivotal for
individualised treatment and care. Histopathological tissue
slides of colorectal cancer specimens contain rich
prognostically relevant information. However, existing
studies do not have multicentre external validation with
real-world sample processing protocols, and algorithms are
not yet widely used in clinical routine.In this
retrospective, multicentre study, we collected tissue
samples from four groups of patients with resected
colorectal cancer from Australia, Germany, and the USA. We
developed and externally validated a deep learning-based
prognostic-stratification system for automatic prediction of
overall and cancer-specific survival in patients with
resected colorectal cancer. We used the model-predicted risk
scores to stratify patients into different risk groups and
compared survival outcomes between these groups.
Additionally, we evaluated the prognostic value of these
risk groups after adjusting for established prognostic
variables.We trained and validated our model on a total of
4428 patients. We found that patients could be divided into
high-risk and low-risk groups on the basis of the deep
learning-based risk score. On the internal test set, the
group with a high-risk score had a worse prognosis than the
group with a low-risk score, as reflected by a hazard ratio
(HR) of 4·50 $(95\%$ CI 3·33-6·09) for overall survival
and 8·35 (5·06-13·78) for disease-specific survival
(DSS). We found consistent performance across three large
external test sets. In a test set of 1395 patients, the
high-risk group had a lower DSS than the low-risk group,
with an HR of 3·08 (2·44-3·89). In two additional test
sets, the HRs for DSS were 2·23 (1·23-4·04) and 3·07
(1·78-5·3). We showed that the prognostic value of the
deep learning-based risk score is independent of established
clinical risk factors.Our findings indicate that
attention-based self-supervised deep learning can robustly
offer a prognosis on clinical outcomes in patients with
colorectal cancer, generalising across different populations
and serving as a potentially new prognostic tool in clinical
decision making for colorectal cancer management. We release
all source codes and trained models under an open-source
licence, allowing other researchers to reuse and build upon
our work.The German Federal Ministry of Health, the
Max-Eder-Programme of German Cancer Aid, the German Federal
Ministry of Education and Research, the German Academic
Exchange Service, and the EU.},
cin = {C120 / C070 / HD01 / C140},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C140-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:38123254},
doi = {10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00208-X},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/286376},
}