001     286376
005     20240229155125.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00208-X
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:38123254
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a altmetric:157572607
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2023-02779
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Jiang, Xiaofeng
|b 0
245 _ _ |a End-to-end prognostication in colorectal cancer by deep learning: a retrospective, multicentre study.
260 _ _ |a London
|c 2023
|b The Lancet
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1703161016_4566
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Precise prognosis prediction in patients with colorectal cancer (ie, forecasting survival) is pivotal for individualised treatment and care. Histopathological tissue slides of colorectal cancer specimens contain rich prognostically relevant information. However, existing studies do not have multicentre external validation with real-world sample processing protocols, and algorithms are not yet widely used in clinical routine.In this retrospective, multicentre study, we collected tissue samples from four groups of patients with resected colorectal cancer from Australia, Germany, and the USA. We developed and externally validated a deep learning-based prognostic-stratification system for automatic prediction of overall and cancer-specific survival in patients with resected colorectal cancer. We used the model-predicted risk scores to stratify patients into different risk groups and compared survival outcomes between these groups. Additionally, we evaluated the prognostic value of these risk groups after adjusting for established prognostic variables.We trained and validated our model on a total of 4428 patients. We found that patients could be divided into high-risk and low-risk groups on the basis of the deep learning-based risk score. On the internal test set, the group with a high-risk score had a worse prognosis than the group with a low-risk score, as reflected by a hazard ratio (HR) of 4·50 (95% CI 3·33-6·09) for overall survival and 8·35 (5·06-13·78) for disease-specific survival (DSS). We found consistent performance across three large external test sets. In a test set of 1395 patients, the high-risk group had a lower DSS than the low-risk group, with an HR of 3·08 (2·44-3·89). In two additional test sets, the HRs for DSS were 2·23 (1·23-4·04) and 3·07 (1·78-5·3). We showed that the prognostic value of the deep learning-based risk score is independent of established clinical risk factors.Our findings indicate that attention-based self-supervised deep learning can robustly offer a prognosis on clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer, generalising across different populations and serving as a potentially new prognostic tool in clinical decision making for colorectal cancer management. We release all source codes and trained models under an open-source licence, allowing other researchers to reuse and build upon our work.The German Federal Ministry of Health, the Max-Eder-Programme of German Cancer Aid, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, the German Academic Exchange Service, and the EU.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|c POF4-313
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
700 1 _ |a Hoffmeister, Michael
|0 P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f
|b 1
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Brenner, Hermann
|0 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
|b 2
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Muti, Hannah Sophie
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Yuan, Tanwei
|0 P:(DE-He78)b9e439a1aa1244925f92d547c0919349
|b 4
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Foersch, Sebastian
|b 5
700 1 _ |a West, Nicholas P
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Brobeil, Alexander
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Jonnagaddala, Jitendra
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Hawkins, Nicholas
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Ward, Robyn L
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Brinker, Titus
|0 P:(DE-He78)1e33961c8780aca9b76d776d1fdc1ebb
|b 11
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Saldanha, Oliver Lester
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Ke, Jia
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Müller, Wolfram
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Grabsch, Heike I
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Quirke, Philip
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Truhn, Daniel
|b 17
700 1 _ |a Kather, Jakob Nikolas
|b 18
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00208-X
|g Vol. 6, no. 1, p. e33 - e43
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2972368-1
|n 1
|p e33 - e43
|t The lancet / Digital health
|v 6
|y 2024
|x 2589-7500
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:286376
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-He78)b9e439a1aa1244925f92d547c0919349
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 11
|6 P:(DE-He78)1e33961c8780aca9b76d776d1fdc1ebb
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b LANCET DIGIT HEALTH : 2022
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2023-05-02T08:53:13Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2023-05-02T08:53:13Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2023-05-02T08:53:13Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a IF >= 30
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9930
|2 StatID
|b LANCET DIGIT HEALTH : 2022
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-23
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
|k C120
|l Präventive Onkologie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
|k C070
|l C070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf.
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
|k HD01
|l DKTK HD zentral
|x 2
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C140-20160331
|k C140
|l NWG Digitale Biomarker in der Onkologie
|x 3
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C140-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21