% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Wagner:286994,
      author       = {A. S. Wagner and M. Milzer$^*$ and K. Steindorf$^*$ and S.
                      Kiermeier and M. E. Schmidt$^*$ and I. Maatouk},
      title        = {{C}ancer-related fatigue: {Q}uality, credibility,
                      usability, and readability of information on websites of
                      health care institutions in {G}ermany.},
      journal      = {Patient education and counseling},
      volume       = {121},
      issn         = {0738-3991},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {DKFZ-2024-00111},
      pages        = {108135},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {This study aimed to portray available information on
                      cancer-related fatigue on German health care institution
                      websites considering the idea of patient empowerment.Based
                      on website quality criteria, we developed a website-rating
                      tool comprising 18 items. Descriptive analyses, a
                      KruskalWallis test, and corresponding post hoc tests
                      comparing rating sum scores between institution groups were
                      performed.Websites of 283 systematically compiled health
                      care institutions were included in the rating.
                      Cancer-related fatigue was introduced on $21.9\%$ and
                      detailed information was provided on $27.9\%$ of the
                      websites. Information material was offered on $9.2\%$ of the
                      websites, while fatigue treatment offers were presented on
                      $21.6\%$ of the websites. The rating sum scores differed
                      between institution groups (p < 0.001), with Comprehensive
                      Cancer Centers scoring significantly higher than the
                      others.The rating revealed an overall sparse provision of
                      information, with fatigue being addressed on less than half
                      of the websites.For patients who have access to at least one
                      introduction about fatigue, institutions need to extend
                      their websites. Patients could further be referred to
                      external institutions or information booklets. The naming of
                      contact persons may help linking patients to providers.},
      keywords     = {Cancer (Other) / Cancer-related fatigue (Other) / Health
                      care institutions (Other) / Patient education (Other) /
                      Patient involvement (Other) / Website quality (Other)},
      cin          = {C110},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-He78)C110-20160331},
      pnm          = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:38199176},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.pec.2024.108135},
      url          = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/286994},
}