% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rontogianni:287459,
author = {M. O. Rontogianni and E. Bouras and E. K. Aglago and H.
Freisling and N. Murphy and M. Cotterchio and J. Hampe and
A. Lindblom and R. K. Pai and P. D. P. Pharoah and A. I.
Phipps and F. J. B. van Duijnhoven and K. Visvanathan and B.
van Guelpen and C. I. Li and H. Brenner$^*$ and A. J.
Pellatt and S. Ogino and M. J. Gunter and U. Peters and S.
Christakoudi and K. K. Tsilidis},
title = {{A}llometric versus traditional body-shape indices and risk
of colorectal cancer: a {M}endelian randomization analysis.},
journal = {International journal of obesity},
volume = {48},
number = {5},
issn = {0307-0565},
address = {Avenel, NJ},
publisher = {Nature Publ. Group},
reportid = {DKFZ-2024-00251},
pages = {709-716},
year = {2024},
note = {2024 May;48(5):709-716},
abstract = {Traditional body-shape indices such as Waist Circumference
(WC), Hip Circumference (HC), and Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR)
are associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, but are
correlated with Body Mass Index (BMI), and adjustment for
BMI introduces a strong correlation with height. Thus, new
allometric indices have been developed, namely A Body Shape
Index (ABSI), Hip Index (HI), and Waist-to-Hip Index (WHI),
which are uncorrelated with weight and height; these have
also been associated with CRC risk in observational studies,
but information from Mendelian randomization (MR) studies is
missing.We used two-sample MR to examine potential causal
cancer site- and sex-specific associations of the
genetically-predicted allometric body-shape indices with CRC
risk, and compared them with BMI-adjusted traditional
body-shape indices, and BMI. Data were obtained from UK
Biobank and the GIANT consortium, and from GECCO, CORECT and
CCFR consortia.WHI was positively associated with CRC in men
(OR per SD: 1.20, $95\%$ CI: 1.03-1.39) and in women (1.15,
1.06-1.24), and similarly for colon and rectal cancer. ABSI
was positively associated with colon and rectal cancer in
men (1.27, 1.03-1.57; and 1.40, 1.10-1.77, respectively),
and with colon cancer in women (1.20, 1.07-1.35). There was
little evidence for association between HI and colon or
rectal cancer. The BMI-adjusted WHR and HC showed similar
associations to WHI and HI, whereas WC showed similar
associations to ABSI only in women.This large MR study
provides strong evidence for a potential causal positive
association of the allometric indices ABSI and WHI with CRC
in both sexes, thus establishing the association between
abdominal fat and CRC without the limitations of the
traditional waist size indices and independently of BMI.
Among the BMI-adjusted traditional indices, WHR and HC
provided equivalent associations with WHI and HI, while
differences were observed between WC and ABSI.},
cin = {C070 / C120 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:38297030},
doi = {10.1038/s41366-024-01479-6},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/287459},
}