% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{LuetkeLanfer:288856,
author = {H. Luetke Lanfer and D. Reifegerste and W. Weber$^*$ and P.
Memenga and E. Baumann and J. Geulen$^*$ and S. Klein$^*$
and A. Müller and A. Hahne and S. Weg-Remers$^*$},
title = {{D}igital clinical empathy in a live chat: multiple
findings from a formative qualitative study and usability
tests.},
journal = {BMC health services research},
volume = {24},
number = {1},
issn = {1472-6963},
address = {London},
publisher = {BioMed Central},
reportid = {DKFZ-2024-00503},
pages = {314},
year = {2024},
note = {#LA:M100#},
abstract = {Clinical empathy is considered a crucial element in
patient-centered care. The advent of digital technology in
healthcare has introduced new dynamics to empathy which
needs to be explored in the context of the technology,
particularly within the context of written live chats. Given
the growing prevalence of written live chats, this study
aimed to explore and evaluate techniques of digital clinical
empathy within a familial cancer-focused live chat, focusing
on how health professionals can (a) understand, (b)
communicate, and (c) act upon users' perspectives and
emotional states.The study utilized a qualitative approach
in two research phases. It examined the expected and
implemented techniques and effectiveness of digital clinical
empathy in a live chat service, involving semi-structured
interviews with health professionals (n = 9), focus group
discussions with potential users (n = 42), and two rounds of
usability tests between health professionals (n = 9) and
users (n = 18). Data were examined using qualitative content
analysis.Expected techniques of digital clinical empathy, as
articulated by both users and health professionals, involve
reciprocal engagement, timely responses, genuine
authenticity, and a balance between professionalism and
informality, all while going beyond immediate queries to
facilitate informed decision-making. Usability tests confirm
these complexities and introduce new challenges, such as
balancing timely, authentic responses with effective,
personalized information management and carefully framed
referrals.The study reveals that the digital realm adds
layers of complexity to the practice of clinical empathy. It
underscores the importance of ongoing adaptation and
suggests that future developments could benefit from a
hybrid model that integrates the strengths of both AI and
human health professionals to meet evolving user needs and
maintain high-quality, empathetic healthcare interactions.},
keywords = {Humans / Empathy / Qualitative Research / Delivery of
Health Care / Health Personnel: psychology / Focus Groups /
Clinical empathy (Other) / Empathy research (Other) / Live
chat (Other) / Qualitative content analysis (Other) /
Usability tests (Other)},
cin = {M100},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)M100-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:38459522},
pmc = {pmc:PMC10921626},
doi = {10.1186/s12913-024-10785-8},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/288856},
}