% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hemminki:289178,
author = {K. Hemminki$^*$ and F. Zitricky and K. Sundquist and J.
Sundquist and A. Försti$^*$ and A. Hemminki and O.
Hemminki},
title = {{C}ritical survival periods in prostate cancer in {S}weden
explored by conditional survival analysis.},
journal = {Cancer medicine},
volume = {13},
number = {7},
issn = {2045-7634},
address = {Hoboken, NJ},
publisher = {Wiley},
reportid = {DKFZ-2024-00613},
pages = {e7126},
year = {2024},
note = {#EA:Z999#},
abstract = {We wanted to characterize conditional survival in prostate
cancer (PC) in Sweden around and after 2005 when the vast
increase in incidence due to the opportunistic testing for
prostate specific antigen (PSA) culminated. We hypothesize
that analyzing survival data during that time period may
help interpret survival trends. We focus on stage-specific
analysis using conditional survival in order to define the
periods when deaths most commonly occurred.Data on PC
patients were obtained from the Swedish cancer registry for
analysis of 1-, 2.5- and 5-year relative survival and
conditional relative survival between years 2004 and 2018.
Tumor-node-metastatic stage classification at diagnosis was
used to specify survival.Small improvements were observed in
stage- and age-related relative survival duriring the study
period. Applying conditional relative survival showed that
survival in stage T3 up to 2.5 years was better than
survival between years 2.5 and 5. Survival in stage T4 was
approximately equal in the first and the subsequent 2.5-year
period. For M1, the first 2.5 year survival period was worse
than the subsequent one. The proportion of high risk and M1
disease in old patients (80+ years) remained very high and
their survival improved only modestly.The data indicate that
M1 metastases kill more patients in the first 2.5 years than
between years 2.5 and 5 after diagnosis; T4 deaths are equal
in the two periods, and in T3 mortality in the first
2.5-year period is lower than between years 2.5 and 5 after
diagnosis. Conditional survival could be applied to explore
critical survival periods even past 5 years after diagnoses
and to monitor success in novel diagnostic and treatment
practices. Improvement of survival in elderly patients may
require clinical input.},
keywords = {age (Other) / conditional relative survival (Other) /
prognosis (Other) / stage (Other) / treatment (Other)},
cin = {Z999 / B062 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)Z999-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)B062-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:38545829},
doi = {10.1002/cam4.7126},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/289178},
}