TY  - JOUR
AU  - Muchadeyi, Muchandifunga
AU  - Hernandez-Villafuerte, Karla
AU  - Di Tanna, Gian Luca
AU  - Eckford, Rachel
AU  - Feng, Yan
AU  - Meregaglia, Michela
AU  - Peasgood, Tessa
AU  - Petrou, Stavros
AU  - Ubels, Jasper
AU  - Schlander, Michael
TI  - Quality Appraisal in Systematic Literature Reviews of Studies Eliciting Health State Utility Values: Conceptual Considerations.
JO  - PharmacoEconomics
VL  - 42
IS  - 7
SN  - 1170-7690
CY  - Berlin [u.a.]
PB  - Springer
M1  - DKFZ-2024-00624
SP  - 767-782
PY  - 2024
N1  - #EA:C100#LA:C100# / 2024 Jul;42(7):767-782
AB  - The increasing number of studies that generate health state utility values (HSUVs) and the impact of HSUVs on cost-utility analyses make a robust tailored quality appraisal (QA) tool for systematic reviews of these studies necessary.This study aimed to address conceptual issues regarding QA in systematic reviews of studies eliciting HSUVs by establishing a consensus on the definitions, dimensions and scope of a QA tool specific to this context.A modified Delphi method was used in this study. An international multidisciplinary panel of seven experts was purposively assembled. The experts engaged in two anonymous online survey rounds. After each round, the experts received structured and controlled feedback on the previous phase. Controlled feedback allowed the experts to re-evaluate and adjust their positions based on collective insights. Following these surveys, a virtual face-to-face meeting was held to resolve outstanding issues. Consensus was defined a priori at all stages of the modified Delphi process.The response rates to the first-round and second-round questionnaires and the virtual consensus meeting were 100
LB  - PUB:(DE-HGF)16
C6  - pmid:38551803
DO  - DOI:10.1007/s40273-024-01365-z
UR  - https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/289190
ER  -