% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Adjei:289367,
author = {N. K. Adjei and F. Samkange-Zeeb and D. Boakye and M.
Saleem and L. Christianson and M. M. Kebede$^*$ and T. L.
Heise and T. Brand and O. B. Esan and D. C. Taylor-Robinson
and C. Agyemang and H. Zeeb},
title = {{E}thnic differences in metabolic syndrome in high-income
countries: {A} systematic review and meta-analysis.},
journal = {Reviews in endocrine $\&$ metabolic disorders},
volume = {25},
number = {4},
issn = {1389-9155},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
reportid = {DKFZ-2024-00757},
pages = {727-750},
year = {2024},
note = {2024 Aug;25(4):727-750},
abstract = {This review aimed to systematically quantify the
differences in Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) prevalence across
various ethnic groups in high-income countries by sex, and
to evaluate the overall prevalence trends from 1996 to 2022.
We conducted a systematic literature review using MEDLINE,
Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, and the Cochrane
Library, focusing on studies about MetS prevalence among
ethnic groups in high-income countries. We pooled 23 studies
that used NCEP-ATP III criteria and included 147,756 healthy
participants aged 18 and above. We calculated pooled
prevalence estimates and $95\%$ confidence intervals (CI)
using both fixed-effect and random-effect intercept logistic
regression models. Data were analysed for 3 periods:
1996-2005, 2006-2009, and 2010-2021. The pooled prevalence
of MetS in high-income countries, based on the NCEP-ATP III
criteria, was $27.4\%$ over the studied period, showing an
increase from $24.2\%$ in 1996-2005 to $31.9\%$ in
2010-2021, with men and women having similar rates. When
stratified by ethnicity and sex, ethnic minority women
experienced the highest prevalence at $31.7\%,$ while ethnic
majority women had the lowest at $22.7\%.$ Notably, MetS was
more prevalent in ethnic minority women than men. Among
ethnic minorities, women had a higher prevalence of MetS
than men, and the difference was highest in Asians (about 15
percentage points). Among women, the prevalence of MetS was
highest in Asians $(41.2\%)$ and lowest in Blacks/Africans
$(26.7\%).$ Among men, it was highest in indigenous minority
groups $(34.3\%)$ and lowest among in Blacks/Africans
$(19.8\%).$ MetS is increasing at an alarming rate in
high-income countries, particularly among ethnic minority
women. The burden of MetS could be effectively reduced by
tailoring interventions according to ethnic variations and
risk profiles.},
subtyp = {Review Article},
keywords = {Burden (Other) / Ethnicity (Other) / High-income Countries
(Other) / Meta-analysis (Other) / Metabolic syndrome (Other)
/ Prevalence (Other)},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:38598068},
doi = {10.1007/s11154-024-09879-9},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/289367},
}