Home > Publications database > Utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests across European countries: a cross-sectional analysis of the European health interview survey 2018–2020 > print

001     289944
005     20250819102225.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100920
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a altmetric:162981901
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2024-00926
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Ola, Idris
|0 P:(DE-He78)1049700ad82fc8a751f5d80a4314473f
|b 0
|e First author
|u dkfz
245 _ _ |a Utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests across European countries: a cross-sectional analysis of the European health interview survey 2018–2020
260 _ _ |a [Amsterdam]
|c 2024
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1714720542_10175
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a #EA:C070#LA:C070#LA:C120#
520 _ _ |a Background:Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to reduce CRC incidence and mortality, and most European countries have started to implement CRC screening programs in the past 20 years. Consequently, this study aimed to estimate the utilization of fecal tests and colonoscopy, as well as investigate factors associated with their utilization based on specific screening program characteristics in European countries.Methods:We analyzed data from the European Health Interview Survey 2018–2020 to determine the utilization of fecal tests [guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT)] within the preceding 2 years or colonoscopy within the preceding 10 years among people aged 50–74 years, based on the type of screening offered in each country. Using multivariable logistic regression and sub-group meta-analysis, factors associated with screening use were determined.Findings:The analyses included data from 129,750 respondents across 29 European countries, with participant counts ranging from 1511 individuals in Iceland to 11,755 individuals in Germany. Unit response rates ranged from 22% to 88%. The use of either test was highest among countries with fully rolled-out programs with fecal tests [from 37.7% (867/2379) in Croatia to 74.9% (2321/3085) in Denmark] and in countries offering colonoscopy as an alternative screening method [from 26.2% (854/3329) in Greece to 75.4% (1192/1760) in Luxembourg]. We observed the lowest utilization of either test in countries with no program or small-scale programs [6.3% (195/3179) in Bulgaria to 34.2% (722/2144) in Latvia]. Across all types of screening offers, younger age, being without a partner, low education, rural residence, and living in large households were associated with lower utilization, as were poor lifestyle scores and prolonged periods without physician consultation.Interpretation:Our findings point to large disparities and much room for improvement in CRC screening offers and utilization across Europe.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|c POF4-313
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
700 1 _ |a Cardoso, Rafael
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Hoffmeister, Michael
|0 P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f
|b 2
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Brenner, Hermann
|0 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
|b 3
|e Last author
|u dkfz
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100920
|g Vol. 41, p. 100920 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)3055963-7
|p 100920
|t The lancet / Regional health. Europe
|v 41
|y 2024
|x 2666-7762
856 4 _ |u https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/289944/files/1-s2.0-S2666776224000875-main.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/289944/files/1-s2.0-S2666776224000875-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:289944
|p VDB
|p OpenAPC
|p openCost
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-He78)1049700ad82fc8a751f5d80a4314473f
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2024
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b LANCET REG HEALTH-EU : 2022
|d 2023-10-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-10-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-10-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-10-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2023-04-12T14:52:56Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2023-04-12T14:52:56Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2023-04-12T14:52:56Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-10-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2023-10-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2023-10-27
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0112
|2 StatID
|b Emerging Sources Citation Index
|d 2023-10-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-10-27
915 _ _ |a IF >= 20
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9920
|2 StatID
|b LANCET REG HEALTH-EU : 2022
|d 2023-10-27
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2023-10-27
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2023-10-27
915 p c |a APC keys set
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
915 p c |a Local Funding
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
915 p c |a DEAL: Elsevier 09/01/2023
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0125
915 p c |a DOAJ Journal
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003
920 2 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
|k C070
|l C070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf.
|x 0
920 2 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
|k C120
|l Präventive Onkologie
|x 1
920 0 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
|k C070
|l C070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf.
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
|k C070
|l C070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf.
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
|k C120
|l Präventive Onkologie
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
|k HD01
|l DKTK HD zentral
|x 2
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a APC

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21