guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Sodium quantification in skeletal muscle: comparison between Cartesian gradient-echo and radial ultra-short echo time 23Na MRI techniques. > print |
| Home > Publications database > Sodium quantification in skeletal muscle: comparison between Cartesian gradient-echo and radial ultra-short echo time 23Na MRI techniques. > print |
| 001 | 290353 | ||
| 005 | 20241218112225.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1186/s41747-024-00461-1 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:38773044 |2 pmid |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a DKFZ-2024-01080 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Gerhalter, Teresa |0 0000-0001-9734-4632 |b 0 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Sodium quantification in skeletal muscle: comparison between Cartesian gradient-echo and radial ultra-short echo time 23Na MRI techniques. |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a [Cham] |c 2024 |b Springer International Publishing |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1716380840_7224 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies often use Cartesian gradient-echo (GRE) sequences with ~2-ms echo times (TEs) to monitor apparent total sodium concentration (aTSC). We compared Cartesian GRE and ultra-short echo time three-dimensional (3D) radial-readout sequences for measuring skeletal muscle aTSC.We retrospectively evaluated 211 datasets from 112 volunteers aged 62.3 ± 12.1 years (mean ± standard deviation), acquired at 3 T from the lower leg. For 23Na MRI acquisitions, we used a two-dimensional Cartesian GRE sequence and a density-adapted 3D radial readout sequence with cuboid field-of-view (DA-3D-RAD-C). We calibrated the 23Na MR signal using reference tubes either with or without agarose and subsequently performed a relaxation correction. Additionally, we employed a six-echo 1H GRE sequence and a multi-echo spin-echo sequence to calculate proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and water T2. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Cohen dz for paired samples, and Spearman correlation were used.Relaxation correction effectively reduced the differences in muscle aTSC between the two acquisition and calibration methods (DA-3D-RAD-C using NaCl/agarose references: 20.05 versus 19.14 mM; dz = 0.395; Cartesian GRE using NaCl/agarose references: 19.50 versus 18.82 mM; dz = 0.427). Both aTSC of the DA-3D-RAD-C and Cartesian GRE acquisitions showed a small but significant correlation with PDFF as well as with water T2.Different 23Na MRI acquisition and calibration approaches affect aTSC values. Applying relaxation correction is advised to minimize the impact of sequence parameters on quantification, and considering additional fat correction is advisable for patients with increased fat fractions.This study highlights relaxation correction's role in improving sodium MRI accuracy, paving the way for better disease assessment and comparability of measured sodium signal in patients.• Differences in MRI acquisition methods hamper the comparability of sodium MRI measurements. • Measured sodium values depend on used MRI sequences and calibration method. • Relaxation correction during postprocessing mitigates these discrepancies. • Thus, relaxation correction enhances accuracy of sodium MRI, aiding its clinical use. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315 |c POF4-315 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Calibration |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Magnetic resonance imaging |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Muscle (skeletal) |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Sodium |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a Volunteers |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Humans |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Middle Aged |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Muscle, Skeletal: diagnostic imaging |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Male |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Female |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Retrospective Studies |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Sodium |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Sodium Isotopes |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Aged |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Adult |2 MeSH |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |a Imaging, Three-Dimensional: methods |2 MeSH |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schilling, Felix |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Zeitouni, Nour |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Linz, Peter |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Baudin, Pierre-Yves |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kannenkeril, Dennis |b 5 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kopp, Christoph |b 6 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Dahlmann, Anke |b 7 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schmieder, Roland |b 8 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Uder, Michael |b 9 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Nagel, Armin M |0 P:(DE-He78)054fd7a5195b75b11fbdc5c360276011 |b 10 |u dkfz |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Gast, Lena V |b 11 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1186/s41747-024-00461-1 |g Vol. 8, no. 1, p. 61 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2905812-0 |n 1 |p 61 |t European radiology experimental |v 8 |y 2024 |x 2509-9280 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/290353/files/s41747-024-00461-1.pdf |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/290353/files/s41747-024-00461-1.pdf?subformat=pdfa |x pdfa |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:290353 |p VDB |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 10 |6 P:(DE-He78)054fd7a5195b75b11fbdc5c360276011 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Gesundheit |l Krebsforschung |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2024 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b EUR RADIOL EXP : 2022 |d 2023-10-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2023-10-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2023-10-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320 |2 StatID |b PubMed Central |d 2023-10-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2023-05-02T09:13:14Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2023-05-02T09:13:14Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Double anonymous peer review |d 2023-05-02T09:13:14Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version) |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV |2 V:(DE-HGF) |b DOAJ |d 2023-05-02T09:13:14Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2023-10-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0112 |2 StatID |b Emerging Sources Citation Index |d 2023-10-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2023-10-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2023-10-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2023-10-27 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2023-10-27 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331 |k E020 |l E020 Med. Physik in der Radiologie |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|