% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Paul:291060,
author = {C. Paul and B. Schöttker$^*$ and M. Hartmann and H.-C.
Friederich and H. Brenner$^*$ and B. Wild},
title = {{G}ender-specific factors associated with case complexity
in middle-aged and older adults-{E}vidence from a large
population-based study.},
journal = {International journal of geriatric psychiatry},
volume = {39},
number = {6},
issn = {0885-6230},
address = {Chichester [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley},
reportid = {DKFZ-2024-01281},
pages = {e6113},
year = {2024},
abstract = {To investigate gender-specific factors associated with case
complexity in a population-based sample of middle-aged and
older adults using a holistic approach to complexity.Data
were derived from the 8-year follow-up home visits of the
ESTHER study-a German population-based study in middle-aged
and older adults. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted
for 2932 persons (aged 57-84). Complexity was assessed by
the well-established INTERMED for the elderly interview,
which uses a holistic approach to the definition of case
complexity. The association between various
bio-psycho-social variables and case complexity was analyzed
using gender-specific logistic regression models, adjusted
for sociodemographic factors (age, marital status,
education).Prevalence of complexity was $8.3\%$ with
significantly higher prevalence in female $(10.6\%)$
compared to male $(5.8\%)$ participants (p < 0.001).
Variables associated with increased odds for complexity in
both, women and men were: being divorced (odds ratio [OR]
women: 1.86, $95\%$ CI 1.05-3.30; OR men: 3.19, 1.25-8.12),
higher total somatic morbidity (women: 1.08, 1.04-1.12; men:
1.06, 1.02-1.11), higher depression severity (women: 1.34,
1.28-1.40; men: 1.35, 1.27-1.44), and higher loneliness
scores (women: 1.19, 1.05-1.36; men: 1.23, 1.03-1.47). Women
(but not men) with obesity (Body mass index [BMI] ≥30) had
higher odds (1.79, 1.11-2.89) for being complex compared to
those with a BMI <25. High oxidative stress measured by
derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites in serum was
associated with 2.02 (1.09-3.74) higher odds for complexity
only in men.This study provides epidemiological evidence on
gender differences in prevalence and factors associated with
case complexity in middle-aged and older adults. Moreover,
this study adds to the holistic understanding of complexity
by identifying novel variables linked to complexity among
middle-aged and older individuals. These factors include
loneliness for both genders, and high oxidative stress for
men. These findings should be confirmed in future
longitudinal studies.},
keywords = {Humans / Female / Male / Aged / Middle Aged /
Cross-Sectional Studies / Aged, 80 and over / Germany:
epidemiology / Sex Factors / Logistic Models / Prevalence /
Risk Factors / Loneliness: psychology /
bio‐psycho‐social (Other) / complexity (Other) /
loneliness (Other) / older adults (Other) / oxidative stress
(Other)},
cin = {C070},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:38877644},
doi = {10.1002/gps.6113},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/291060},
}