% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Sauerbier:291075,
author = {F. Sauerbier and J. Haerting and D. Sedding and R.
Mikolajczyk and K. Werdan and S. Nuding and K. H.
Greiser$^*$ and C. A. Swenne and J. A. Kors and A. Kluttig},
title = {{I}mpact of {QRS} misclassifications on
heart-rate-variability parameters (results from the {CARLA}
cohort study).},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
volume = {19},
number = {6},
issn = {1932-6203},
address = {San Francisco, California, US},
publisher = {PLOS},
reportid = {DKFZ-2024-01295},
pages = {e0304893 -},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Heart rate variability (HRV), an important marker of
autonomic nervous system activity, is usually determined
from electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings corrected for
extrasystoles and artifacts. Especially in large
population-based studies, computer-based algorithms are used
to determine RR intervals. The Modular ECG Analysis System
MEANS is a widely used tool, especially in large studies.
The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate MEANS for
its ability to detect non-sinus ECG beats and artifacts and
to compare HRV parameters in relation to ECG processing.
Additionally, we analyzed how ECG processing affects the
statistical association of HRV with cardiovascular disease
(CVD) risk factors.20-min ECGs from 1,674 subjects of the
population-based CARLA study were available for HRV
analysis. All ECGs were processed with the ECG computer
program MEANS. A reference standard was established by
experienced clinicians who visually inspected the
MEANS-processed ECGs and reclassified beats if necessary.
HRV parameters were calculated for 5-minute segments
selected from the original 20-minute ECG. The effects of
misclassified typified normal beats on i) HRV calculation
and ii) the associations of CVD risk factors (sex, age,
diabetes, myocardial infarction) with HRV were modeled using
linear regression.Compared to the reference standard, MEANS
correctly classified $99\%$ of all beats. The averaged
sensitivity of MEANS across all ECGs to detect non-sinus
beats was $76\%$ $[95\%$ CI: 74.1;78.5], but for
supraventricular extrasystoles detection sensitivity dropped
to $38\%$ $[95\%$ CI: 36.8;38.5]. Time-domain parameters
were less affected by false sinus beats than frequency
parameters. Compared to the reference standard, MEANS
resulted in a higher SDNN on average (mean absolute
difference 1.4ms $[95\%$ CI: 1.0;1.7], relative $4.9\%).$
Other HRV parameters were also overestimated as well
(between 6.5 and $29\%).$ The effect estimates for the
association of CVD risk factors with HRV did not differ
between the editing methods.We have shown that the use of
the automated MEANS algorithm may lead to an overestimation
of HRV due to the misclassification of non-sinus beats,
especially in frequency domain parameters. However, in
population-based studies, this has no effect on the observed
associations of HRV with risk factors, and therefore an
automated ECG analyzing algorithm as MEANS can be
recommended here for the determination of HRV parameters.},
keywords = {Humans / Heart Rate: physiology / Electrocardiography:
methods / Female / Male / Middle Aged / Aged / Cohort
Studies / Algorithms / Cardiovascular Diseases: diagnosis /
Cardiovascular Diseases: physiopathology / Risk Factors},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:38885223},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0304893},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/291075},
}