% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hummel:291566,
author = {M. Hummel$^*$ and T. Hielscher$^*$ and M. Emde-Rajaratnam
and H. Salwender and S. Beck and C. Scheid and U. Bertsch
and H. Goldschmidt and A. Jauch and J. Moreaux and A.
Seckinger and D. Hose},
title = {{Q}uantitative {I}ntegrative {S}urvival {P}rediction in
{M}ultiple {M}yeloma {P}atients {T}reated {W}ith
{B}ortezomib-{B}ased {I}nduction, {H}igh-{D}ose {T}herapy
and {A}utologous {S}tem {C}ell {T}ransplantation.},
journal = {JCO precision oncology},
volume = {8},
number = {8},
issn = {2473-4284},
address = {Alexandria, VA},
publisher = {American Society of Clinical Oncology},
reportid = {DKFZ-2024-01451},
pages = {e2300613},
year = {2024},
note = {#EA:C060#},
abstract = {Given the high heterogeneity in survival for patients with
multiple myeloma, it would be clinically useful to
quantitatively predict the individual survival instead of
attributing patients to two to four risk groups as in
current models, for example, revised International Staging
System (R-ISS), R2-ISS, or Mayo-2022-score.Our aim was to
develop a quantitative prediction tool for individual
patient's 3-/5-year overall survival (OS) probability. We
integrated established clinical and molecular risk factors
into a comprehensive prognostic model and evaluated and
validated its risk discrimination capabilities versus R-ISS,
R2-ISS, and Mayo-2022-score.A nomogram for estimating OS
probabilities was built on the basis of a Cox regression
model. It allows one to translate the individual risk
profile of a patient into 3-/5-year OS probabilities by
attributing points to each prognostic factor and summing up
all points. The nomogram was externally validated regarding
discrimination and calibration. There was no obvious bias or
overfitting of the prognostic index on the validation
cohort. Resampling-based and external evaluation showed good
calibration. The c-index of the model was similar on the
training (0.76) and validation cohort (0.75) and
significantly higher than for the R-ISS (P < .001) or R2-ISS
(P < .01).In summary, we developed and validated individual
quantitative nomogram-based OS prediction. Continuous risk
assessment integrating molecular prognostic factors is
superior to R-ISS, R2-ISS, or Mayo-2022-score alone.},
keywords = {Multiple Myeloma: mortality / Multiple Myeloma: therapy /
Multiple Myeloma: drug therapy / Humans / Bortezomib:
therapeutic use / Male / Female / Middle Aged /
Transplantation, Autologous / Nomograms / Aged / Prognosis /
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation / Antineoplastic
Agents: therapeutic use / Induction Chemotherapy / Adult /
Survival Rate / Bortezomib (NLM Chemicals) / Antineoplastic
Agents (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {C060},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:38986047},
doi = {10.1200/PO.23.00613},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/291566},
}