% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Viallon:291781,
author = {V. Viallon and H. Freisling and K. Matta and A. Ø. Nannsen
and C. C. Dahm and A. Tjønneland and A. K. Eriksen and R.
Kaaks$^*$ and V. A. Katzke$^*$ and M. B. Schulze and G.
Masala and G. Tagliabue and V. Simeon and R. Tumino and L.
Milani and J. W. G. Derksen and Y. T. van der Schouw and T.
H. Nøst and K. B. Borch and T. M. Sandanger and J. R.
Quirós and M. Rodriguez-Barranco and C. Bonet and A.
Aizpurua-Atxega and L. Cirera and M. Guevara and B.
Sundström and A. Winkvist and A. K. Heath and M. J. Gunter
and E. Weiderpass and M. Johansson and P. Ferrari},
title = {{O}n the use of the healthy lifestyle index to investigate
specific disease outcomes.},
journal = {Scientific reports},
volume = {14},
number = {1},
issn = {2045-2322},
address = {[London]},
publisher = {Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature},
reportid = {DKFZ-2024-01517},
pages = {16330},
year = {2024},
abstract = {The healthy lifestyle index (HLI), defined as the
unweighted sum of individual lifestyle components, was used
to investigate the combined role of lifestyle factors on
health-related outcomes. We introduced weighted
outcome-specific versions of the HLI, where individual
lifestyle components were weighted according to their
associations with disease outcomes. Within the European
Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC),
we examined the association between the standard and the
outcome-specific HLIs and the risk of T2D, CVD, cancer, and
all-cause premature mortality. Estimates of the hazard
ratios (HRs), the Harrell's C-index and the population
attributable fractions (PAFs) were compared. For T2D, the HR
for 1-SD increase of the standard and T2D-specific HLI were
0.66 $(95\%$ CI: 0.64, 0.67) and 0.43 (0.42, 0.44),
respectively, and the C-index were 0.63 (0.62, 0.64) and
0.72 (0.72, 0.73). Similar, yet less pronounced differences
in HR and C-index were observed for standard and
outcome-specific estimates for cancer, CVD and all-cause
mortality. PAF estimates for mortality before age 80 were
$57\%$ $(55\%,$ $58\%)$ and $33\%$ $(32\%,$ $34\%)$ for
standard and mortality-specific HLI, respectively. The use
of outcome-specific HLI could improve the assessment of the
role of lifestyle factors on disease outcomes, thus
enhancing the definition of public health recommendations.},
keywords = {Humans / Healthy Lifestyle / Male / Female / Middle Aged /
Neoplasms: mortality / Neoplasms: epidemiology /
Cardiovascular Diseases: mortality / Cardiovascular
Diseases: epidemiology / Prospective Studies / Aged / Adult
/ Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2: mortality / Diabetes Mellitus,
Type 2: epidemiology / Risk Factors / Proportional Hazards
Models / Europe: epidemiology / Mortality, Premature / Life
Style / Cancer (Other) / Cardiovascular diseases (Other) /
Composite score (Other) / Healthy lifestyle index (Other) /
Lifestyle factors (Other) / Mortality (Other) / Type 2
diabetes (Other)},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {600},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39009699},
pmc = {pmc:PMC11250810},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-024-66772-w},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/291781},
}