% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Sha:291917,
author = {S. Sha$^*$ and M. Degen$^*$ and T. Vlaski$^*$ and Z.
Fan$^*$ and H. Brenner$^*$ and B. Schöttker$^*$},
title = {{T}he {S}afety {P}rofile of {V}itamin {D} {S}upplements
{U}sing {R}eal-{W}orld {D}ata from 445,493 {P}articipants of
the {UK} {B}iobank: {S}lightly {H}igher {H}ypercalcemia
{P}revalence but {N}either {I}ncreased {R}isks of {K}idney
{S}tones nor {A}therosclerosis.},
journal = {Nutrients},
volume = {16},
number = {14},
issn = {2072-6643},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {DKFZ-2024-01529},
pages = {2251},
year = {2024},
note = {#EA:C070#LA:C070#LA:C120#},
abstract = {Background: Potential calcium-related adverse events of
vitamin D supplement use have not been addressed in
large-scale, real-world data so far. Methods: Leveraging
data from the UK Biobank, encompassing 445,493 individuals
aged 40-69, we examined associations of high
25-hydroxyvitamin (25(OH)D) levels ≥ 100 nmol/L and
vitamin D supplementation with hypercalcemia (serum calcium
> 2.6 mmol/L), kidney stones, and atherosclerosis
assessments (pulse wave arterial stiffness index and carotid
intima-medial thickness). Regression models were
comprehensively adjusted for 49 covariates. Results:
Approximately $1.5\%$ of the participants had high 25(OH)D
levels, $4.3\%$ regularly used vitamin D supplements, and
$20.4\%$ reported regular multivitamin use. At baseline, the
hypercalcemia prevalence was $1.6\%,$ and $1.1\%$ was
diagnosed with kidney stones during follow-up. High 25(OH)D
levels were neither associated with calcium-related adverse
events nor atherosclerosis assessments. Vitamin D and
multivitamin supplementation were associated with an
increased prevalence of hypercalcemia (odds ratios and
$95\%$ confidence intervals: 1.46 [1.32-1.62] and 1.11
[1.04-1.18], respectively) but were neither associated with
atherosclerosis nor future kidney stones. Conclusions: High
25(OH)D levels observable in routine care were not
associated with any adverse outcome. Vitamin D users have a
slightly higher prevalence of hypercalcemia, possibly due to
co-supplementation with calcium, but without a higher
atherosclerosis prevalence or risk of kidney stones.},
keywords = {Humans / Hypercalcemia: epidemiology / Hypercalcemia:
chemically induced / Vitamin D: analogs $\&$ derivatives /
Vitamin D: blood / Vitamin D: administration $\&$ dosage /
Middle Aged / Male / Female / Dietary Supplements: adverse
effects / United Kingdom: epidemiology / Kidney Calculi:
epidemiology / Kidney Calculi: blood / Aged /
Atherosclerosis: epidemiology / Atherosclerosis: etiology /
Adult / Prevalence / Biological Specimen Banks / Risk
Factors / Calcium: blood / Calcium: administration $\&$
dosage / UK Biobank / adverse events (Other) /
atherosclerosis (Other) / hypercalcemia (Other) / kidney
stone risk (Other) / real-world evidence (Other) / serum
25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (Other) / vitamin D
supplementation (Other) / Vitamin D (NLM Chemicals) /
25-hydroxyvitamin D (NLM Chemicals) / Calcium (NLM
Chemicals)},
cin = {C070 / C120 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39064694},
pmc = {pmc:PMC11279740},
doi = {10.3390/nu16142251},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/291917},
}